Invisible minimalism.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This essay attempts a rapprochement between Kent Bach's view on semantic minimalism and the most radical version of contextualism about language on offer: Charles Travis's occasion-sensitivity. Despite common assumptions held by defenders of semantic literalism - which cast Bach's proposal as a form of contextualism - Bach rejects all conceivable forms of contextualism. In this paper, I argue that in spite of his systematic rejection of contextualism, Bach's position bears a striking resemblance to Travis's occasionsensitivity. Further, when analyzed in light of the conceptual framework developed by Travis, Bach's strand of minimalism can be shown to contain a deeprooted conceptual inconsistency to the extent that he aims to ascribe "pure semantic content" to a linguistic entity that is necessarily pragmatic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Text & Talk is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)