Menu
×
Main Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. – 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 588-2001
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. – 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 883-3914
John's Island Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
McClellanville Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Edisto Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 p.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
Main Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. – 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 588-2001
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. – 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 883-3914
John's Island Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
McClellanville Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Edisto Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 p.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Larsson, Amanda1 ; Rolfson, Ola1,2; Kärrholm, Johan1,2
- Source:
Acta Orthopaedica. Jun2019, Vol. 90 Issue 3, p253-257. 5p. 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 1 Graph.- Subject Terms:
- Source:
- Additional Information
- Abstract: Background and purpose — Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed mainly because of pain. To evaluate the result after surgery, different questionnaires measuring the patient-reported outcome regarding quality of life are used. Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), designed to chart postoperative symptoms, was developed to find subtle differences between patients who report that their operated hip is "very good" or "excellent." We evaluated whether FJS provides additional information compared with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and ceiling and floor effects with use of these instruments. We also studied level of internal consistency for OHS and FJS, and the reproducibility of the FJS. Patients and methods — 111 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA in 2015 were included. The participants answered 2 questionnaires: Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Hip Score. Floor and ceiling effects were recorded for each of the instruments and agreement between them. The FJS was studied with respect to reproducibility and level of internal consistency. Results — OHS ceiling effect (31%) was higher compared with FJS (21%), whereas the OHS seemed to provide a more nuanced picture of patients with an inferior clinical result. Floor effect for FJS was 3% and 0% for OHS. The degree of explanation was 68% between the 2 questionnaires (linear regression, r2 = 0.68). FJS items had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's a = 0.93) and reproducibility (Pearson correlation = 0.87, ICC = 0.93); 92 patients answered on 2 distributions of the FJS questionnaires, 19 patients had identical answers. Interpretation — OHS had a larger ceiling effect than FJS, which could indicate that FJS is a more fine-tuned instrument to separate patients with good to excellent outcome after THA. The high internal consistency of FJS indicates that the items of the instrument consistently cover the construct of joint awareness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract: Copyright of Acta Orthopaedica is the property of Medical Journals Sweden AB and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Abstract:
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.