Suvremena znanstvena relevantnost Marxove analize kapitala (u povodu rasprave o knjizi Daga Strpića Robna proizvodnja i udruženi rad u Marxovoj kritici političke ekonomije ).

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      CONTEMPORARY SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE OF MARX’S ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The paper discusses the relevance of Marx’s analysis of capital and the manner in which that contribution is presented in the book on Marx’s critique of political economy written by Dag Strpić. At the beginning of the paper, the author indicates some elements of the general theoretical framework within which Strpić formulated his research on Marx’s critique of political economy. The paper raises two fundamental questions concerning Marx’s critique of political economy: 1. Can a fundamental starting point be drawn from Marx’s theoretical framework for understanding the importance of institutions in the economic process, as seen by the representatives of old and new institutionalism in political economy? 2. Can a unique explanation of economic crises be derived from reading Marx’s categorical apparatus? The answer to the first question shows that there are certain similarities between Marx’s approach and the approach advocated by economic institutionalists, but also there exist significant differences between the two approaches. The answer to the second question shows that Marx did not develop a unique theory of crises, since there are arguments indicating the existence of two or three different crisis theories which can be found in his work. After that, the author shows, using most general terms, that Marx’s critique of political economy is primarily situated by his attitude towards the classical school, but that it also has some potential to correspond with modern economics. The author shows that the direction of correspondence refers primarily to the explanation of fundamental tendencies in the development of the capitalist system. The conclusion of the paper reviews some of Strpić’s fundamental contributions to political economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      U radu se razmatraju relevantnost Marxove analize kapitala i značaj prikaza te analize u Strpićevoj knjizi o Marxovoj kritici političke ekonomije. Autor na početku rada naznačuje neke elemente općeg teorijskog okvira u koji je Strpić postavio svoje istraživanje Marxove kritike političke ekonomije. Nakon toga razmatraju se dva temeljna pitanja koja se tiču same Marxove kritike političke ekonomije: 1. Može li se iz Marxova teorijskog sklopa izvući temeljna potka za razumijevanje važnosti institucija u ekonomskom procesu na način na koji ih vide predstavnici starog i novog institucionalizma u političkoj ekonomiji? 2. Može li se iz čitanja Marxova kategorijalnog aparata izvesti jedinstveno razumijevanje ekonomskih kriza? U odgovoru na prvo pitanje pokazuje se da postoje određene sličnosti između Marxova i pristupa ekonomskih institucionalista, no isto tako i značajne razlike između tih dvaju pristupa. U odgovoru na drugo pitanje pokazuje se da Marx nije razvio jedinstvenu teoriju kriza, već da se u njegovu djelu mogu pronaći argumenti za dvije ili tri različite teorije kriza. Nakon toga se u najopćenitijim crtama pokazuje da je Marxova kritika političke ekonomije prvenstveno situirana svojim odnosom prema klasičnoj školi, ali da posjeduje i određeni potencijal korespondiranja sa suvremenom ekonomskom znanošću. Autor pokazuje da se pravac te korespondencije odnosi prvenstveno na objašnjenje temeljnih tendencija u razvoju kapitalističkog sistema. U zaključku rada navode se neki od temeljnih Strpićevih doprinosa političkoj ekonomiji. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Politicka Misao: Croatian Political Science Review is the property of Fakultet Politickih Znanosti and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)