Truer U.S. History: Race, Borders, and Status Manipulation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      In How to Hide an Empire, Daniel Immerwahr "storms the citadel" of U.S. history in a gripping retelling that places empire and its hiding at the heart of the American experiment. Aware that further absences also haunt U.S. history, he invites successors to catalog them to produce yet-truer histories of the United States. This Review takes up the invitation. It sketches out a legal history of race and borders in the United States in which indigeneity, race, slavery, and immigration join empire on center stage. Like Immerwahr's, this history is of shameful and selfobscuring events. Unlike Immerwahr's, it centers on the ways that law accomplished and hid the wrongs done. The crucial mechanism is "status manipulation," a term in deliberate tension with itself. Status presents as a fixed, enduring legal classification that relates people and places to polities. By contrast, manipulation involves purposeful change. Hence, as used here, "status manipulation" combines apparent continuity and actual change as it achieves subordination from the shadows. Status is thus posed as immemorial and permanent despite always being constructed and reconstructed--an apt metaphor for a nation that has endlessly violated its ideals without rejecting them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Yale Law Journal is the property of Yale Law Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)