Efficacy and safety of rituximab in comparison with common induction therapies in pediatric active lupus nephritis.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Childhood-onset lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite treatment-related toxicities, cyclophosphamide (CYC) and glucocorticoid-based treatment protocols are still considered standard therapy in managing this multisystem disorder. An effective and safe alternative induction regimen is needed. Methods: Forty-four pediatric patients with active LN aged 3.5-13.8 (median 8.4) years, of whom 32 entered the study at diagnosis of SLE, were followed over 36 months. Induction therapy consisted of methylprednisolone pulses followed by either rituximab (RTX) ( n = 17), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) ( n = 12) or pulse-CYC ( n = 15), with tapering dose of prednisolone orally. MMF was added as maintenance immunosuppressant (800 mg/m daily) in all children from the third month onward. Results: Flare-free survival was significantly higher at 36 months with RTX compared with MMF and CYC (100% for RTX vs. 83% for MMF. and 53% for CYC, p = 0·006). Twelve patients (76.5%) achieved complete remission with RTX compared with five (41.7%) and seven (46.7%) with MMF and CYC, respectively, at last follow-up. Requirement of mean daily dosage of prednisone was significantly lower in RTX group [ p = 0.005 (RTX vs MMF); 0.0001 (RTX vs CYC) at 36 months] compared with other groups after the 3-month follow-up. In comparison with few minor adverse events in the other two cohorts, several serious adverse events occurred in the CYC group. Conclusions: Efficacy and medium-term safety of RTX induction followed by MMF maintenance therapy in inducing and maintaining remission among children with LN were evident in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]