Chagas disease-specific antigens: characterization of epitopes in CRA/FRA by synthetic peptide mapping and evaluation by ELISA-peptide assay.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968551 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2334 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712334 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Infect Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: The identification of epitopes in proteins recognized by medically relevant antibodies is useful for the development of peptide-based diagnostics and vaccines. In this study, epitopes in the cytoplasmic repetitive antigen (CRA) and flagellar repetitive antigen (FRA) proteins from Trypanosoma cruzi were identified using synthetic peptide techniques and pooled sera from Chagasic patients. The epitopes were further assayed with an ELISA assay based on synthetic peptides.
      Methods: Twenty-two overlapping synthetic peptides representing the coding sequence of the T. cruzi CRA and FRA proteins were assessed by a Spot-synthesis array analysis using sera donated by patients with Chagas disease. Shorter peptides were selected that represented the determined epitopes and synthesized by solid phase synthesis to evaluate the patterns of cross-reactivities and discrimination through an ELISA-diagnostic assay.
      Results: The peptide Spot-synthesis array successfully identified two IgG antigenic determinants in the CRA protein and four in FRA. Bioinformatics suggested that the CRA antigens were unique to T. cruzi while the FRA antigen showed similarity with sequences present within various proteins from Leishmania sp. Subsequently, shorter peptides representing the CRA-1, CRA-2 and FRA-1 epitopes were synthesized by solid phase synthesis and assayed by an ELISA-diagnostic assay. The CRA antigens gave a high discrimination between Chagasic, Leishmaniasis and T. cruzi-uninfected serum. A sensitivity and specificity of 100% was calculated for CRA. While the FRA antigen showed a slightly lower sensitivity (91.6%), its specificity was only 60%.
      Conclusions: The epitopes recognized by human anti-T. cruzi antibodies have been precisely located in two biomarkers of T. cruzi, CRA and FRA. The results from screening a panel of patient sera through an ELISA assay based on peptides representing these epitopes strongly suggest that the sequences from CRA would be useful for the development of diagnostic reagents that could improve upon the sensitivity and specificity of currently available diagnostic tests. Overall, the results provide further evidence of the usefulness of identifying specific linear B-cell epitopes for improving diagnostic tools.
    • References:
      Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009 Jul;104 Suppl 1:115-21. (PMID: 19753466)
      Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:108-17. (PMID: 17894355)
      J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8. (PMID: 8744570)
      Eur J Immunol. 1994 Dec;24(12):3188-93. (PMID: 7805747)
      Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1994 Mar;32(3):465-73. (PMID: 7518277)
      J Immunol Methods. 1994 Dec 28;177(1-2):131-7. (PMID: 7822819)
      Parasitol Res. 2005 Jun;96(3):154-61. (PMID: 15856302)
      FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Jul 1;164(1):125-31. (PMID: 9675858)
      J Immunol Methods. 1991 Sep 13;142(2):187-98. (PMID: 1717598)
      Trends Parasitol. 2001 Jun;17(6):286-91. (PMID: 11378036)
      Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003 Jul-Aug;36(4):435-40. (PMID: 12937718)
      Mol Immunol. 2008 Jul;45(12):3477-89. (PMID: 18023478)
      J Immunoassay. 1983;4(2):175-206. (PMID: 6886015)
      Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009 Jul;104 Suppl 1:31-40. (PMID: 19753455)
      Scand J Immunol. 1995 Jan;41(1):85-93. (PMID: 7824893)
      J Immunol Methods. 1995 Jan 13;178(1):1-12. (PMID: 7530266)
      Mol Immunol. 1994 Oct;31(14):1037-46. (PMID: 7935495)
      Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009 Jul;104 Suppl 1:136-41. (PMID: 19753468)
      Hum Immunol. 2010 Oct;71(10):964-7. (PMID: 20659514)
      Anal Chem. 1994 Nov 1;66(21):3723-6. (PMID: 7528478)
      Nat Protoc. 2010 Apr;5(4):725-38. (PMID: 20360767)
      Exp Parasitol. 2011 Mar;127(3):672-9. (PMID: 21118687)
      Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Apr;46(4):427-34. (PMID: 1575289)
      Hum Immunol. 2011 May;72(5):402-5. (PMID: 21371515)
      J Immunol Methods. 2002 Sep 1;267(1):13-26. (PMID: 12135797)
      Toxicon. 2013 Sep;72:90-101. (PMID: 23792452)
      Biochemistry. 1995 Feb 7;34(5):1750-9. (PMID: 7849035)
      Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994 Aug;66(2):187-200. (PMID: 7808469)
      Infect Immun. 1995 Jan;63(1):38-42. (PMID: 7806382)
      Clin Chem. 1993 Apr;39(4):561-77. (PMID: 8472349)
      Infect Immun. 2008 Sep;76(9):3967-74. (PMID: 18625739)
      Biochem J. 1981 Aug 1;197(2):465-71. (PMID: 7034718)
      J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug;48(8):2948-52. (PMID: 20554821)
      Mol Immunol. 1983 Apr;20(4):483-9. (PMID: 6191210)
      Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. (PMID: 7063747)
      Transfusion. 1993 Oct;33(10):830-4. (PMID: 8236424)
      Nature. 2010 Jun 24;465(7301):S4-5. (PMID: 20571553)
      J Immunol Methods. 1987 Sep 24;102(2):259-74. (PMID: 2443575)
      Biosens Bioelectron. 2003 Nov 15;19(2):79-84. (PMID: 14568706)
      Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Jan;46(1):39-43. (PMID: 1536382)
      J Mol Recognit. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):75-82. (PMID: 17205610)
      J Clin Lab Anal. 2007;21(5):271-6. (PMID: 17847109)
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Antibodies, Protozoan)
      0 (Antigens, Protozoan)
      0 (Peptides)
      0 (cytoplasmic antigen, Trypanosoma)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20131205 Date Completed: 20140623 Latest Revision: 20211021
    • Publication Date:
      20240104
    • Accession Number:
      PMC3890492
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/1471-2334-13-568
    • Accession Number:
      24299278