An exploration of the ecological validity of the Virtual Action Planning-Supermarket (VAP-S) with people with schizophrenia.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Aubin G;Aubin G; Béliveau MF; Béliveau MF; Klinger E; Klinger E
  • Source:
    Neuropsychological rehabilitation [Neuropsychol Rehabil] 2018 Jul; Vol. 28 (5), pp. 689-708. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 28.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Validation Study
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9112672 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1464-0694 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09602011 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Neuropsychol Rehabil Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: [London] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
      Original Publication: Hove, East Sussex, UK : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., c1991-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      People with schizophrenia often have functional limitations that affect their daily activities due to executive function deficits. One way to assess these deficits is through the use of virtual reality programmes that reproduce real-life instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). One such programme is the Virtual Action Planning-Supermarket (VAP-S). This exploratory study aimed to examine the ecological validity of this programme, specifically, how task performance in both virtual and natural environments compares. Case studies were used and involved five participants with schizophrenia, who were familiar with grocery shopping. They were assessed during both the VAP-S shopping task and a real-life grocery shopping task using an observational assessment tool, the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform (PRPP) System of Task Analysis. The results show that when difficulties were present in the virtual task, difficulties were also observed in the real-life task. For some participants, greater difficulties were observed in the virtual task. These difficulties could be explained by the presence of perceptual deficits and problems remembering the required sequenced actions in the virtual task. In conclusion, performance on the VAP-S by these five participants was generally comparable to the performance in a natural environment.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Ecological validity; Executive function; Generalisability; Schizophrenia; Virtual Action Planning–Supermarket
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20150829 Date Completed: 20180911 Latest Revision: 20191210
    • Publication Date:
      20240104
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/09602011.2015.1074083
    • Accession Number:
      26317526