Using Co-authorship Networks to Map and Analyse Global Neglected Tropical Disease Research with an Affiliation to Germany.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101291488 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-2735 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19352727 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
      Authorship* ; Bibliometrics* ; Biomedical Research* ; Neglected Diseases* ; Tropical Medicine*; Academies and Institutes ; Brazil ; Databases, Factual ; Germany ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Publications ; Research Personnel
    • Abstract:
      Background: Research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) has increased in recent decades, and significant need-gaps in diagnostic and treatment tools remain. Analysing bibliometric data from published research is a powerful method for revealing research efforts, partnerships and expertise. We aim to identify and map NTD research networks in Germany and their partners abroad to enable an informed and transparent evaluation of German contributions to NTD research.
      Methodology/principal Findings: A SCOPUS database search for articles with German author affiliations that were published between 2002 and 2012 was conducted for kinetoplastid and helminth diseases. Open-access tools were used for data cleaning and scientometrics (OpenRefine), geocoding (OpenStreetMaps) and to create (Table2Net), visualise and analyse co-authorship networks (Gephi). From 26,833 publications from around the world that addressed 11 diseases, we identified 1,187 (4.4%) with at least one German author affiliation, and we processed 972 publications for the five most published-about diseases. Of those, we extracted 4,007 individual authors and 863 research institutions to construct co-author networks. The majority of co-authors outside Germany were from high-income countries and Brazil. Collaborations with partners on the African continent remain scattered. NTD research within Germany was distributed among 220 research institutions. We identified strong performers on an individual level by using classic parameters (number of publications, h-index) and social network analysis parameters (betweenness centrality). The research network characteristics varied strongly between diseases.
      Conclusions/significance: The share of NTD publications with German affiliations is approximately half of its share in other fields of medical research. This finding underlines the need to identify barriers and expand Germany's otherwise strong research activities towards NTDs. A geospatial analysis of research collaborations with partners abroad can support decisions to strengthen research capacity, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, which were less involved in collaborations than high-income countries. Identifying knowledge hubs within individual researcher networks complements traditional scientometric indicators that are used to identify opportunities for collaboration. Using free tools to analyse research processes and output could facilitate data-driven health policies. Our findings contribute to the prioritisation of efforts in German NTD research at a time of impending local and global policy decisions.
    • Comments:
      Comment in: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec;9(12):e0004266. (PMID: 26720414)
    • References:
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):404-9. (PMID: 11149952)
      BMJ. 2005 Oct 1;331(7519):705-6. (PMID: 16195259)
      Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):892-5. (PMID: 19213908)
      Lancet. 2009 Feb 21;373(9664):630-1. (PMID: 19231627)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 18;3(8):e501. (PMID: 19688044)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 May 25;4(5):e718. (PMID: 20520793)
      Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):252-69. (PMID: 21227500)
      Wurzbg Medizinhist Mitt. 2010;29:43-72. (PMID: 21563369)
      Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Sep 01;10:28. (PMID: 22938160)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45569. (PMID: 23056208)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(10):e1803. (PMID: 23145186)
      Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):999. (PMID: 24054521)
      Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1702-3. (PMID: 24267997)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Dec 05;7(12):e2568. (PMID: 24340113)
      Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 28;7:24565. (PMID: 25079287)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Aug 14;8(8):e3078. (PMID: 25121582)
      Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1302-4. (PMID: 25214621)
      BMJ. 2015 Mar 05;350:h1210. (PMID: 25744556)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20160101 Date Completed: 20160608 Latest Revision: 20220321
    • Publication Date:
      20240104
    • Accession Number:
      PMC4703140
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pntd.0004182
    • Accession Number:
      26719978