Mismatch between femur and tibia coronal alignment in the knee joint: classification of five lower limb types according to femoral and tibial mechanical alignment.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968565 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2474 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712474 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2000-

Femur/*diagnostic imaging ; Femur/*physiology ; Knee Joint/*diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint/*physiology ; Tibia/*diagnostic imaging ; Tibia/*physiology; Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology ; Female ; Femur/abnormalities ; Humans ; Knee Joint/abnormalities ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibia/abnormalities ; Weight-Bearing/physiology ; Young Adult

Background: Reasons for dissatisfaction with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include unequal flexion or extension gap, soft tissue imbalance, and patella maltracking, which often occur with mismatch between femoral and tibial coronal bony alignment in the knee joint or extremely varus or valgus alignment. However, lower limb coronal alignment classification is based only on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), leading to oversight regarding a mismatch between femoral and tibial coronal alignment. We aimed to classify alignment of the lower limbs according to the mechanical alignment of the femur and tibia in a healthy population.
Methods: All 214 normal triple films were reviewed retrospectively. HKAA, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), angle between the femoral anatomical axis and the mechanical axis (AA-MA), and knee alignment angle (KAA) were measured. Subjects were categorized into one of five types based on the mechanical alignment of femur and tibia.
Results: Mean HKAA, mLDFA, and mMPTA of all subjects were 1.2°, 87.3°, and 85.8°, respectively. All subjects were classified into one of five types with significant differences (p < 0.001). About 61% of subjects showed neutral alignment, of which nearly 40% were type 2 (valgus of the femur and varus of the tibia with oblique joint line: mLDFA 85.0° ± 1.4°, mMPTA 85.1° ± 1.2°, TJLA 2.7° ± 2.4°) and 60% exhibited neutral alignment with a neutral femur and tibia (type 1). In varus and valgus types, mismatch between the mechanical angle of the femur and tibia was common. Varus alignment, including types 3 (varus of the tibia: mLDFA 88.0° ± 1.4°, mMPTA 83.5° ± 1.6°) and 4 (varus of both the tibia and femur: mLDFA 91.4° ± 1.4°, mMTPA 85.2° ± 2.0°), was found in 30% of subjects. Valgus alignment (type 5 valgus of femur: mLDFA 84.6° ± 1.6°, mMPTA 88.8° ± 2.0°) accounted for 8.9% of all subjects.
Conclusions: Mismatch between mechanical alignment of the femur and tibia was common in varus and valgus alignment types. Joint line obliquity was also observed in 40% of the neutral alignment population. This classification provides a quick, simple interpretation of femoral and tibial coronal alignment, and more detailed guidance for preoperative planning for TKA than the traditional varus-neutral-valgus classification.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1189-91. (PMID: 24534535)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002 Feb;17(2):140-6. (PMID: 11832264)
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):273-83. (PMID: 24366186)
Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):635-40. (PMID: 17945498)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):45-53. (PMID: 21656315)
J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1796-801. (PMID: 17787049)
Knee. 2009 Jan;16(1):42-5. (PMID: 18790641)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):26-34. (PMID: 15534515)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):745-9. (PMID: 3597474)
Knee. 2014 Aug;21(4):866-70. (PMID: 24835581)
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):907-13. (PMID: 24986944)
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997 Jan;5(1):39-47. (PMID: 9010877)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. (PMID: 19844772)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):98-104. (PMID: 23733590)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):893-900. (PMID: 17673581)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jun;(255):215-27. (PMID: 2347155)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):168-72. (PMID: 7497664)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Feb;80(2):163-73. (PMID: 9486722)
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Oct;19(10):590-9. (PMID: 21980024)
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Jul;25(7):499-508. (PMID: 28644188)
Singapore Med J. 2015 May;56(5):259-63. (PMID: 26034317)
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):39-43. (PMID: 19553073)
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jul;37(7):389-98. (PMID: 17710908)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82-A(11):1603-8. (PMID: 11097451)
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2003 Oct;94(10):296-303. (PMID: 14689881)
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2002 Mar;2(3):277-80. (PMID: 15758453)
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Sep;18(9):528-36. (PMID: 20810934)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Jan-Feb;(192):13-22. (PMID: 3967412)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):504-9. (PMID: 18841432)
J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;36(3):472-7. (PMID: 19286859)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1121-7. (PMID: 18757949)
Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(5):293-6. (PMID: 26024704)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1306-14. (PMID: 17545435)
Orthopade. 2014 Dec;43 Suppl 1:S1-10. (PMID: 25331499)
Acta Orthop. 2005 Jun;76(3):403-7. (PMID: 16156470)
J Orthop Sci. 2000;5(3):232-7. (PMID: 10982663)
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Mar;27(1):49-55. (PMID: 25750894)

Keywords: Coronal limb alignment; Mechanical alignment; Mismatch between femur and tibia; Normal knee; mLDFA; mMPTA

Date Created: 20181127 Date Completed: 20190311 Latest Revision: 20190311

20240105

PMC6260902

10.1186/s12891-018-2335-9

30474544