Quality of out-of-hours telephone triage by general practitioners and nurses: development and testing of the AQTT - an assessment tool measuring communication, patient safety and efficiency.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Taylor & Francis Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8510679 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1502-7724 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02813432 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Scand J Prim Health Care Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Philadelphia, PA : Taylor & Francis
      Original Publication: Stockholm, Sweden : Almqvist & Wiksell Periodical Co., [1983-
    • Subject Terms:
      General Practitioners* ; Nurses* ; Quality of Health Care* ; Surveys and Questionnaires* ; Telephone*; After-Hours Care/*standards ; Triage/*standards; Adult ; After-Hours Care/methods ; Aged ; Communication ; Denmark ; Efficiency ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Patient Safety ; Referral and Consultation ; Triage/methods
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To develop a valid and reliable assessment tool able to measure quality of communication, patient safety and efficiency in out-of-hours (OOH) telephone triage conducted by both general practitioners (GP) and nurses.
      Design: The Dutch KERNset tool was translated into Danish and supplemented with items from other existing tools. Face validity, content validity and applicability in OOH telephone triage (OOH-TT) were secured through a two-round Delphi process involving relevant stakeholders. Forty-eight OOH patient contacts were assessed by 24 assessors in test-retest and inter-rater designs.
      Setting: OOH-TT services in Denmark conducted by GPs, nurses or doctors with varying medical specialisation.
      Patients: Audio-recorded OOH patient contacts.
      Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were analysed using ICC agreement , Fleiss' kappa and percent agreement.
      Results: Major adaptations during the Delphi process were made. The 24-item assessment tool (Assessment of Quality in Telephone Triage - AQTT) measured communicative quality, health-related quality and four overall quality aspects. The test-retest ICC agreement reliability was good for the overall quality of communication (0.85), health-related quality (0.83), patient safety (0.81) and efficiency (0.77) and satisfactory when assessing specific aspects. Inter-rater reliability revealed reduced reliability in ICC agreement and in Fleiss' kappa. Percent agreement revealed satisfactory agreements when differentiating between 'poor' and 'sufficient' quality).
      Conclusion: The AQTT demonstrated high face, content and construct validity, satisfactory test-retest reliability, reduced inter-rater reliability, but satisfactory percent agreement when differentiating between 'poor' and 'sufficient' quality. The AQTT was found feasible and clinically relevant for assessing the quality of GP- and nurse-led OOH-TT. KEYPOINTS Comparative knowledge is sparse regarding quality of out-of-hours telephone triage conducted by general practitioners and nurses. The assessment tool (AQTT) enables assessment of quality in OOH telephone triage conducted by nurses and general practitioners AQTT is feasible and clinically relevant for assessment of communication, patient safety and efficiency. AQTT can be used to identify areas for improvement in telephone triage.
    • References:
      Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):23-7. (PMID: 10321391)
      Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000 Sep;18(3):139-42. (PMID: 11097097)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2005 Sep;27(6):802-30. (PMID: 16283900)
      Nurs Health Sci. 2007 Mar;9(1):23-8. (PMID: 17300541)
      J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):187-95. (PMID: 17331095)
      Br J Gen Pract. 2007 May;57(538):383-7. (PMID: 17504589)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 23;9:105. (PMID: 19549325)
      Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1022-8. (PMID: 19638766)
      J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. (PMID: 20874835)
      Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):198-209. (PMID: 22126218)
      BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 05;4(3):e004515. (PMID: 24598305)
      Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Mar;32(1):44-50. (PMID: 24635578)
      Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:36-47. (PMID: 25514212)
      Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(13):1-212, vii-viii. (PMID: 25690266)
      J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Sep;21(6):305-22. (PMID: 25761468)
      Acta Clin Belg. 2015 Oct;70(5):309-14. (PMID: 25819448)
      J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. (PMID: 27330520)
      BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 14;18(1):34. (PMID: 28292257)
      Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):737-742. (PMID: 28418455)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 31;17(1):379. (PMID: 28566087)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):798. (PMID: 29197376)
      Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
      BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1502-5. (PMID: 9582141)
      Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Nov;35(3):161-76. (PMID: 9887849)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: After hours care; communication; general practitioners; outcome assessment (health care); patient safety; telephone; triage
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190129 Date Completed: 20190528 Latest Revision: 20200225
    • Publication Date:
      20240104
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6454404
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/02813432.2019.1568712
    • Accession Number:
      30689490