The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Adaptation, Psychological* ; Information Technology* ; Stress, Psychological*; Aging/*psychology; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Austria ; Communications Media ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Multilevel Analysis ; Organizational Culture ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Switzerland ; Workplace/psychology ; Young Adult

This study seeks to explain the interplay between chronological age and technology-related strain through techno-stressors and coping strategy choices in organizational settings. Grounded in Lazarus´ stress theory, theories of cognitive aging, the life span theory of control and socioemotional selectivity theory, this study argues that even though older workers are more prone to techno-stressors, aging is connected to gaining coping skills, which in turn reduce technology-related strain over time. Understanding these processes enables modifying employees' coping strategy choices and mitigating negative outcomes of technostress at the workplace. Longitudinal data from 1,216 employees over a time period of 8 months were used to perform multilevel mediation modeling. The findings reveal that age was negatively related to technology-related strain. The link between age and technology-related strain was explained through behavioral disengagement, which older workers used less than younger workers. Active coping and social coping did not act as mediators of this relationship across time points. These relationships were stable after controlling for dependency on technology.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:383-409. (PMID: 19575618)
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):422-36. (PMID: 22731610)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Sep;59(3):525-37. (PMID: 2231283)
Geriatr Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):266-72. (PMID: 27055911)
Stress Health. 2011 Apr;27(2):e48-60. (PMID: 27486623)
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;219:14-20. (PMID: 26799871)
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Mar;65B(2):135-44. (PMID: 20054013)
Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):447-59. (PMID: 16248704)
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(2):287-97. (PMID: 22080104)
Ment Illn. 2011 Sep 02;3(1):e7. (PMID: 25478099)
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2017 Apr;23(2):160-171. (PMID: 29460697)
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jan;62(1):P61-4. (PMID: 17284559)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):862-82. (PMID: 21859226)
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1913-5. (PMID: 16809530)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83. (PMID: 2926629)
Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):284-304. (PMID: 7740091)
Dev Psychol. 2014 Feb;50(2):634-48. (PMID: 23834293)
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:471-507. (PMID: 15012462)
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1132-46. (PMID: 20822228)
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):403-28. (PMID: 8759042)
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:679-704. (PMID: 19572784)
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:255-271. (PMID: 28532355)
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):32-60. (PMID: 20063963)
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):459-67. (PMID: 11419806)
J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Sep;21(3):219-39. (PMID: 7410799)
J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):P174-80. (PMID: 2071843)
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Oct;17(4):473-491. (PMID: 23066697)

Date Created: 20190306 Date Completed: 20191212 Latest Revision: 20200309

20240105

PMC6400396

10.1371/journal.pone.0213349

30835773