Are Austrian practitioners ready to use medical apps? Results of a validation study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Hofer F;Hofer F; Haluza D; Haluza D
  • Source:
    BMC medical informatics and decision making [BMC Med Inform Decis Mak] 2019 Apr 24; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 88. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 24.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Validation Study
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088682 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6947 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726947 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: As part of the mobile revolution, smartphone-based applications (apps) have become almost indispensable in today's information society. Consequently, the use of medical apps among healthcare professionals has increased heavily over the past years. As little is known on medical app use in day-to-day clinical practice in Austria, the present study aims at closing this knowledge gap by assessing respective prevalence, readiness, and concerns among Austrian practitioners.
      Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a sample of 151 Austrian doctors (mean age 45.0, SD 12.0, 55.0% females). We developed a German study questionnaire on the basis of the Practitioner Telehealth Readiness Assessment Tool (PRAT) to assess medical app use-related readiness and attitudes, and validated it using principal component analysis.
      Results: In our study, 74% of participants used medical apps on a daily basis, with clarity, ease of use, speed, and support in clinical routine mentioned as most important app features. However, the majority of participants perceived certain barriers to use medical apps. Younger participants used more medical apps, were more likely to use them during work, and yielded higher readiness scores. The most often used medical apps were Diagnosia and Embryotox (both 28.5%).
      Conclusions: Nowadays, medical apps serve as an important source of information for many doctors and are especially popular among younger physicians. The omnipresence of smartphones in the smocks of healthcare workers raised awareness for potential shortcomings regarding disruption of traditional face-to-face doctor-patient interaction among all healthcare stakeholders. This study's finding thus highlight the need for initiating a public discussion on legal and social frameworks to successfully integrate mobile apps into everyday clinical.
    • References:
      J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):140-6. (PMID: 20386034)
      Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Oct-Dec;34(4):297-307. (PMID: 26506291)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 29;19(1):26. (PMID: 30696444)
      J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34. (PMID: 15471760)
      Genome Med. 2016 Dec 19;8(1):134. (PMID: 27993174)
      Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1b. (PMID: 22737094)
      J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):2020-30. (PMID: 25898861)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 11;13(8):. (PMID: 27529261)
      Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;248:180-187. (PMID: 29726435)
      Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;248:322-329. (PMID: 29726454)
      Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283rv3. (PMID: 25877894)
      J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(5):259-63. (PMID: 14599328)
      Rheumatol Int. 2018 Nov;38(11):2103-2109. (PMID: 30167765)
      Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Dec;19(12):727-732. (PMID: 27849366)
      Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Sep;68(9):1060-4. (PMID: 24837250)
      J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Apr;98(2):157-60. (PMID: 20428281)
      Technol Health Care. 2009;17(2):149-57. (PMID: 19564680)
      Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:782-7. (PMID: 26294563)
      Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. (PMID: 16204405)
      Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jan;84(1):48-57. (PMID: 25293532)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 10;12:67. (PMID: 22781312)
      JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Oct 21;2(4):e42. (PMID: 25338094)
      J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9 Suppl 2:S27-30. (PMID: 14728753)
      Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:56-64. (PMID: 29029692)
      Health Commun. 2017 Nov;32(11):1342-1349. (PMID: 27710132)
      Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Jan;43(1):1-11. (PMID: 28005444)
      P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64. (PMID: 24883008)
      J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):107-9. (PMID: 20386031)
      J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):164. (PMID: 25526706)
      Health Informatics J. 2019 Mar;25(1):161-173. (PMID: 28438103)
      Intern Med J. 2017 Mar;47(3):291-298. (PMID: 27925381)
      JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jun;149(6):661-2. (PMID: 23783150)
      J Med Syst. 2017 Jan;41(1):4. (PMID: 27822871)
      Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Jan 1;12(1):43-7. (PMID: 26804143)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Oct 30;12:121. (PMID: 23110712)
      Nurse Res. 2005;13(2):55-70. (PMID: 16416980)
      Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3893-3898. (PMID: 28815302)
      PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0213067. (PMID: 30818348)
      Nurs Health Sci. 2010 Sep 1;12(3):369-74. (PMID: 20727089)
      Scott Med J. 2015 Nov;60(4):152-4. (PMID: 26329587)
      Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(7):1-292. (PMID: 24334772)
      Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jul;30(3):298-305. (PMID: 25308693)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Health communication; Healthcare personnel; Medical technologies; Principal components analysis; Telemedicine; mHealth
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190425 Date Completed: 20191218 Latest Revision: 20200309
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6480835
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12911-019-0811-2
    • Accession Number:
      31014333