Canonical correlations between individual self-efficacy/organizational bottom-up approach and perceived barriers to reporting medication errors: a multicenter study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Kim MS;Kim MS; Kim CH; Kim CH
  • Source:
    BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2019 Jul 16; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 495. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 16.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Multicenter Study
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Individual and organizational factors correlate with perceived barriers to error reporting. Understanding medication administration errors (MAEs) reduces confusion about error definitions, raises perceptions of MAEs, and allows healthcare providers to report perceived and identified errors more frequently. Therefore, an emphasis must be placed on medication competence, including medication administration knowledge and decision-making. It can be helpful to utilize an organizational approach, such as collaboration between nurses and physicians, but this type of approach is difficult to establish and maintain because patient-safety culture starts at the highest levels of the healthcare organization. This study aimed to examine the canonical correlations of an individual self-efficacy/bottom-up organizational approach variable set with perceived barriers to reporting MAEs among nurses.
      Methods: We surveyed 218 staff nurses in Korea. The measurement tools included a questionnaire on knowledge of high-alert medication, nursing decision-making, nurse-physician collaboration satisfaction, and barriers to reporting MAEs. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's correlation coefficient, and canonical correlations were used to analyze results.
      Results: Two canonical variables were significant. The first variate indicated that less knowledge about medication administration (- 0.83) and a higher perception of nurse-physician collaboration (0.42) were related to higher disagreement over medication error (0.64). The second variate showed that intuitive clinical decision-making (- 0.57) and a higher perception of nurse-physician collaboration (0.84) were related to lower perceived barriers to reporting MAEs.
      Conclusions: Enhancing positive collaboration among healthcare professionals and promoting analytic decision-making supported by sufficient knowledge could facilitate MAE reporting by nurses. In the clinical phase, providing medication administration education and improving collaboration may reduce disagreement about the occurrence of errors and facilitate MAE reporting. In the policy phase, developing an evidence-based reporting system that informs analytic decision-making may reduce the perceived barriers to MAE reporting.
    • References:
      J Prof Nurs. 1999 Sep-Oct;15(5):275-80. (PMID: 10554467)
      J Prof Nurs. 2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):93-100. (PMID: 11977007)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):39-43. (PMID: 16456208)
      Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. (PMID: 16977646)
      AORN J. 2007 Mar;85(3):527-43. (PMID: 17352892)
      Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jun;45(6):855-68. (PMID: 17362959)
      J Nurs Manag. 2009 Mar;17(2):218-22. (PMID: 19416425)
      Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Feb;26(1):1-9. (PMID: 19945283)
      Nurs Outlook. 2010 Jan-Feb;58(1):17-25. (PMID: 20113751)
      J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jan;66(1):177-90. (PMID: 20423443)
      J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):464-78. (PMID: 20738454)
      Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011 Mar;7(1):93-107. (PMID: 21397884)
      Nurs Res Pract. 2011;2011:524918. (PMID: 21994830)
      J Patient Saf. 2012 Dec;8(4):165-76. (PMID: 23007239)
      J Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;9(1):1-7. (PMID: 23007242)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 26;13:54. (PMID: 23622342)
      J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21(9):797-805. (PMID: 24646372)
      Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;70(6):637-45. (PMID: 24671697)
      J Nurs Care Qual. 2015 Jul-Sep;30(3):240-6. (PMID: 25479238)
      Health Policy. 2015 Apr;119(4):539-48. (PMID: 25554702)
      J Nurs Manag. 2016 Jan;24(1):E54-61. (PMID: 25703584)
      Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2015 Mar;9(1):14-20. (PMID: 25829205)
      Crit Care Nurse. 2015 Apr;35(2):66-72. (PMID: 25834009)
      Implement Sci. 2015 May 19;10:70. (PMID: 25986004)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 14;15:326. (PMID: 26272228)
      J Nurs Manag. 2016 Jul;24(5):580-8. (PMID: 26888342)
      J Patient Saf. 2016 Mar 24;:null. (PMID: 27010325)
      J Clin Nurs. 2016 Sep;25(17-18):2468-77. (PMID: 27264690)
      J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;7(3):87-92. (PMID: 27330261)
      Springerplus. 2016 Jun 24;5(1):871. (PMID: 27386320)
      BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 01;16(1):230. (PMID: 27581521)
      PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0167683. (PMID: 27977697)
      Health Promot Perspect. 2017 Jun 14;7(3):168-174. (PMID: 28695106)
      J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1287-1293. (PMID: 28771860)
      J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):e402-e411. (PMID: 28926146)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):728-734. (PMID: 28992153)
      Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Jun;41:73-79. (PMID: 29853219)
      J Patient Saf. 2018 Nov 9;:null. (PMID: 30418425)
      Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):858-863. (PMID: 30528260)
      Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5. (PMID: 3640358)
      Am J Nurs. 1987 Jan;87(1):23-31. (PMID: 3642979)
      Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1996 Jul-Aug;1(4):191-7. (PMID: 9192569)
      Am J Crit Care. 1997 Sep;6(5):393-9. (PMID: 9283677)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Intersectoral collaboration; Knowledge; Medication errors; Social perception
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190718 Date Completed: 20191115 Latest Revision: 20200225
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6636092
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12913-019-4194-y
    • Accession Number:
      31311542