Health checks and cardiovascular risk factor values over six years' follow-up: Matched cohort study using electronic health records in England.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Alageel S;Alageel S;Alageel S; Gulliford MC; Gulliford MC
  • Source:
    PLoS medicine [PLoS Med] 2019 Jul 30; Vol. 16 (7), pp. e1002863. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 30 (Print Publication: 2019).
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101231360 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1549-1676 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15491277 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, [2004]-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: The National Health Service (NHS) in England introduced a population-wide programme for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in 2009, known as NHS Health Checks. This research aimed to measure the cardiovascular risk management and cardiovascular risk factor outcomes of the health check programme during six years' follow-up.
      Methods and Findings: A controlled interrupted time series study was conducted. Participants were registered with general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in England and received health checks between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2013. Control participants, who did not receive a health check, were matched for age, sex, and general practice. Outcomes were blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Analyses estimated the net effect of health check by year, allowing for the underlying trend in risk factor values and baseline differences between cases and controls, adjusting for age, sex, deprivation, and clustering by general practice. There were 127,891 health check participants and 322,910 matched controls. Compared with controls, health check participants had lower BMI (cases mean 27.0, SD 4.8; controls 27.3, SD 5.6, Kg/m2), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (cases 129.0, SD 14.3; controls 129.3, SD 15.0, mm Hg), and smoking (21% in health check participants versus 27% in controls), but total and HDL cholesterol were similar. Health check participants were more likely to receive weight management advice (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.03, 4.98 to 5.08, P < 0.001), smoking cessation interventions (HR 3.20, 3.13 to 3.27, P < 0.001), or statins (HR 1.24, 1.21 to 1.27, P < 0.001). There were net reductions in risk factor values up to six years after the check for BMI (-0.30, -0.39 to -0.20 Kg/m2, P < 0.001), SBP (-1.43, -1.70 to -1.16 mm Hg, P < 0.001), and smoking (17% in health check participants versus 25% in controls; odds ratio 0.90, 0.87 to 0.94, P < 0.001). The main study limitation was that residual confounding may be present because randomisation was not employed; health check-associated measurement introduced differential recording that might cause bias.
      Conclusions: Our results suggest that people who take up a health check generally have lower risk factor values than controls and are more likely to receive risk factor interventions. Risk factor values show net reductions up to six years following a health check in BMI, blood pressure, and smoking, which may be of public health importance.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):1-25. (PMID: 28527533)
      PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89554. (PMID: 24586867)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):552-559. (PMID: 26350481)
      Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. (PMID: 27283160)
      Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44. (PMID: 24268083)
      Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Fall;19(4):613-23. (PMID: 15095767)
      Can J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;47(1):68-75. (PMID: 11873711)
      Stat Med. 2008 Nov 10;27(25):5143-55. (PMID: 18613226)
      BMJ. 2016 Feb 25;352:i969. (PMID: 26916049)
      BMJ. 2012 Nov 20;345:e7191. (PMID: 23169868)
      Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1357-61. (PMID: 24243711)
      BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e008840. (PMID: 26762161)
      Addict Behav. 2011 Jul;36(7):764-8. (PMID: 21420791)
      BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e017169. (PMID: 28801437)
      BMJ. 2018 Apr 30;361:k1479. (PMID: 29712648)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Jun 1;40(2):e151-e156. (PMID: 28633511)
      Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. (PMID: 26050254)
      Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 31;52(7):594-605. (PMID: 29860363)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):234-40. (PMID: 25326192)
      Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-53. (PMID: 24567582)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Mar;35(1):85-91. (PMID: 22829660)
      BMJ. 2009 Apr 02;338:b1024. (PMID: 19342408)
      BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):313-20. (PMID: 8124121)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):187-92. (PMID: 26022810)
      BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e015375. (PMID: 28619779)
      BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1099-104. (PMID: 7742676)
      Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):426-35. (PMID: 23377607)
      BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1475-82. (PMID: 18573856)
      CMAJ. 2016 Jul 12;188(10):E228-E238. (PMID: 27141033)
      BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 30;19(1):171. (PMID: 30376826)
      Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 7;37(42):3232-3245. (PMID: 27523477)
    • Grant Information:
      United Kingdom DH_ Department of Health
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Biomarkers)
      0 (Cholesterol, HDL)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190731 Date Completed: 20191219 Latest Revision: 20200309
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6667114
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pmed.1002863
    • Accession Number:
      31361740