Ailing Hearts and Troubled Minds: An Historical and Narratological Study on Illness Narratives by Physicians with Cardiac Disease.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Wistrand J;Wistrand J
  • Source:
    The Journal of medical humanities [J Med Humanit] 2022 Mar; Vol. 43 (1), pp. 129-139.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8917478 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-3645 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10413545 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Med Humanit Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: New York, NY : Springer
      Original Publication: New York, N.Y. : Human Sciences Press, [c1989-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      A number of studies show that when doctors become ill, there is often ambiguity in the division of roles and responsibilities in the medical encounter. Yet little is known about how the dilemma of the sick doctor has changed over time. This article explores the experience of illness among physicians by applying an historical, narratological approach to three doctor's narratives about personal cases of cardiac disease: Max Pinner's from the 1940s, Robert Seaver's from the 1980s, and John Mulligan's from 2015. Drawing on Erving Goffman's principles of social interaction, I argue that part of the challenge in the analysed narratives is because when doctors seek medical attention for themselves, the ensuing medical 'drama' suffers. I compare the three narratives to argue that the experience of becoming a patient while simultaneously remaining a doctor is a challenge that has changed over time. In Pinner's narrative, the patient identity is both undesirable and inaccessible; in Seaver's, role ambivalence between doctor and patient is the most salient feature; for Mulligan, his personal rather than professional experience of illness is the overarching theme of the narrative. Finally, I suggest that an awareness of how the medical drama often changes when doctors are patients might prove beneficial both for the doctor-patients and providers of medical care.
      (© 2020. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      J Med Humanit. 2015 Dec;36(4):359-68. (PMID: 24221860)
      Med Humanit. 2013 Dec 1;39(2):105-14. (PMID: 23515010)
      Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1975 Summer;53(3):257-78. (PMID: 1041510)
      Perspect Biol Med. 2014 Summer;57(3):424-42. (PMID: 25959354)
      Med Humanit. 2017 Mar;43(1):19-23. (PMID: 27587488)
      J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):927-32. (PMID: 21851510)
      Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):868-869. (PMID: 30837137)
      N Engl J Med. 1945 Nov 29;233:657-9. (PMID: 21003935)
      Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jul;58(552):501-8. (PMID: 18611318)
      Can Fam Physician. 2003 Sep;49:1121-7. (PMID: 14526864)
      J Community Health. 2016 Oct;41(5):924-31. (PMID: 26894999)
      Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Summer;50(3):379-94. (PMID: 17660632)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Cultural history; Literature and medicine; Physician narratives; Sociology
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200129 Date Completed: 20220309 Latest Revision: 20220316
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8901460
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s10912-020-09610-0
    • Accession Number:
      31989405