Defining Expertise in Cancer Nursing Practice.

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7805358 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1538-9804 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0162220X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cancer Nurs Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: <2002->: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: New York, Masson Publishing USA.

Leadership*; Clinical Competence/*standards ; Neoplasms/*nursing ; Oncology Nursing/*organization & administration ; Practice Patterns, Nurses'/*organization & administration; Australia ; Empathy ; Focus Groups ; Humans ; Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration

Background: Thirty-five years ago, Benner defined an expert nurse as one who applies deep knowledge and experience across different contexts and clinical situations. Since that time, there has been little exploration of expertise in cancer nursing.
Objectives: To explore and describe characteristics of expert cancer nurses and to consider whether Benner's typology of an expert nurse remains relevant in today's complex oncology settings.
Methods: An exploratory, descriptive study using audio-recorded focus group methodology was undertaken. Audio-recordings were transcribed, and an inductive thematic analysis approach applied to the data. Nurses also documented key characteristics of expert practice on Post-it notes to illustrate dominant characteristics.
Results: Twenty-four registered nurses from a comprehensive cancer center in Australia took part in 1 of 3 focus groups. Seven key themes were identified: knowledge, leadership, adaptability, communication, motivation, patient-centered care, organization, and culture. Key word cloud characteristics included knowledge, compassion, motivation, experience, and communication.
Conclusions: Many of the expert characteristics identified in this study reflect traits common to other nursing specialty groups. Of particular relevance to cancer nurses was "adaptability," reflecting the complexity of contemporary cancer care and reaffirming Benner's definition of an expert nurse as one who can fluidly connect knowledge and experience to unfamiliar practice contexts.
Implications for Practice: Understanding characteristics of expert cancer nurses may help inform and support professional practice advancement and guide future research about select characteristics of expert cancer nurses to patient- and system-level outcomes.
Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

World Health Organization. Non-communicable diseases and mental health. https://www.who.int/nmh/a5816/en. Accessed December 19, 2018.
Scotté F, Ratta R, Beuzeboc P. Side effects of immunotherapy: a constant challenge for oncologists [published online]. Curr Opin Oncol. 2019;31(4):280–285. doi:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000541. (PMID: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000541)
Sarfati D, Koczwara B, Jackson C. The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):337–350.
Benner P. From Novice to Expert. Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1984.
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A Five Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Direct Skill Acquisition. Washington, DC: Storming Media; 1980.
Itano JK, Pierce M, Masten KB, Whitley MJ. Developing the oncology nurse from novice to expert. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19(8):1233–1234.
Johnson LR, Cohen MZ, Hull MM. Cultivating expertise in oncology nursing: methods, mentors, and memories. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994;21(suppl 8):27–34.
Enskär K. Being an expert nurse in pediatric oncology care: nurses’ descriptions in narratives. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2012;29(3):151–160.
Gray DE. Doing Research in the Real World. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2013.
Creswell JW. Qualitative Injury and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Springer; 2019:843–860.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
http://www.wordle.net/. Accessed December 2019.
Kendall-Gallagher D, Blegen MA. Competence and certification of registered nurses and safety of patients in intensive care units. Am J Criti Care. 2009;18(2):106–113. quiz 114.
Bonner A. Recognition of expertise: an important concept in the acquisition of nephrology nursing expertise. Nurs Health Sci. 2003;5(2):123–131.
Tubbert SJ. Resiliency in emergency department nurses. Education Doctoral. 2014;196:1–111.
Cone KJ, Murray R. Characteristics, insights, decision making, and preparation of ED triage nurses. J Emerg Nurs. 2002;28(5):401–406.
Hardy S, Titchen A, Manley K, McCormack B. Re-defining nursing expertise in the United Kingdom. Nurs Sci Q. 2006;19(3):260–264.
Cutcliffe JR. The nature of expert psychiatric nurse practice: a grounded theory study. J Clin Nurs. 1997;6:325–332.
Johnston B, Smith LN. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of expert palliative nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(6):700–709.
Darbyshire P. Skilled expert practice: is it ‘all in the mind’? A response to English’s critique of Benner’s novice to expert model. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19:755–761.
Roche J, Morsi D, Chandler GE. Testing a work empowerment-work relationship model to explain expertise in experienced acute care nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2009;39(3):115–122.

Date Created: 20200321 Date Completed: 20210715 Latest Revision: 20210715

20240105

10.1097/NCC.0000000000000805

32195712