Sustainable by design: a systematic review of factors for health promotion program sustainability.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Bodkin A;Bodkin A; Hakimi S; Hakimi S
  • Source:
    BMC public health [BMC Public Health] 2020 Jun 19; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 964. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 19.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Systematic Review
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Sustaining health promotion programs (HPP) is critical to maintain their intended health benefits, community capacity, and to optimize resources and investment. However, not all programs are sustained beyond their initial implementation period. This is partly due to uncertainty regarding sustainability: lack of a clear definition; infrequent use of a sustainability framework; and lack of understanding of the factors that influence sustainability. The aim of this systematic review is to identify barriers and facilitators that promote or inhibit the sustainability of HPP, particularly those that can be considered in program planning.
      Methods: Two search strategies were used: 1) electronic database searching; and 2) grey literature searching. Inclusion criteria included papers published since 1998, in English, focusing on the sustainability of HPP that explicitly used a sustainability framework and specifically reported on facilitators and barriers to sustainability. Exclusion criteria included papers that addressed environmental, system or sector sustainability. Quality assessment was conducted on all included papers and a quality assessment tool was developed for grey literature. Data analysis included a thematic analysis, using an a priori framework to initially code barriers and facilitators, which were then grouped into factors for HPP sustainability. Factors were then analyzed for frequency, importance, and relevance, and categorized into one of three tiers.
      Results: Sixteen papers were included in this review. Eleven definitions of sustainability and 13 sustainability frameworks were used. A total of 83 barriers and 191 facilitators were identified and categorized into 14 factors: nine from the a priori framework, and five additional ones based on the results of our analysis. Tier 1 factors were the most important for sustainability with organizational capacity scoring the highest; tier 3, the least important.
      Conclusion: This review provides clarity regarding existing definitions of sustainability and sustainability frameworks. It identifies fourteen factors that influence program sustainability, which practitioners can consider when planning, developing and implementing HPP. In addition, it is important for practitioners to clearly articulate program elements that should be sustained, define sustainability as it relates to the context of their program, select a sustainability framework to guide their work, and consider these factors for sustainability.
    • References:
      Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 23;11:130184. (PMID: 24456645)
      Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. (PMID: 19490148)
      Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. (PMID: 23480423)
      Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Jul;97(1 Suppl 1):S31-5. (PMID: 16892769)
      Health Promot Pract. 2018 Sep;19(1_suppl):78S-91S. (PMID: 30176770)
      Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 01;8:15. (PMID: 23375082)
      Am J Health Promot. 1989 Spring;3(4):34-43. (PMID: 22206393)
      Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):502-515. (PMID: 30307680)
      Obes Rev. 2018 Jun;19(6):839-851. (PMID: 29603583)
      BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37. (PMID: 23497061)
      Glob Health Promot. 2017 Sep;24(3):49-58. (PMID: 27160035)
      Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):87-108. (PMID: 10178339)
      Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov;31(8):e1-7. (PMID: 21185111)
      J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jan;12(1):113-8. (PMID: 18068434)
      Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2059-67. (PMID: 21940916)
      PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. (PMID: 19621072)
      J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun;36(2):347-51. (PMID: 24860152)
      Health Policy. 1997 Jan;39(1):29-42. (PMID: 10164903)
      Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Sep;58(1-2):192-210. (PMID: 27624514)
      BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):914. (PMID: 29183296)
      Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;130:67-76. (PMID: 28575728)
      Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):e73-80. (PMID: 23409904)
      Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):126. (PMID: 30257695)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 25;19(1):189. (PMID: 30909897)
      J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33(4):258-66. (PMID: 24347104)
      Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Apr;24(1):53-60. (PMID: 23575590)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Health promotion programs; Institutionalization; Program planning; Program sustainability; Public health; Routinization
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200621 Date Completed: 20201104 Latest Revision: 20201104
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7304137
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12889-020-09091-9
    • Accession Number:
      32560718