Female genital mutilation and women's healthcare experiences with general practitioners in the Netherlands: A qualitative study.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Physician-Patient Relations*; Circumcision, Female/*psychology ; General Practitioners/*standards ; Patients/*psychology; Adult ; Female ; General Practitioners/psychology ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Patient Satisfaction ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trust

Objectives: While the general practitioner (GP) in the Netherlands is the first point of entry to and gatekeeper of the healthcare system, no study exists to explore the experiences of women with female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) in general practice. Therefore, the aim of this study is to look into the experiences of women with FGM/C in Dutch general practice.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were held with 16 women with FGM/C. Sampling was purposeful. The interview guide and thematic analysis were based on the Illness Perception Model and Kleinman's Explanatory model. Interviews were held in English or Dutch. All data were anonymized, and recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed.
Results: The women considered FGM/C to be connected to a range of health problems, for which not all of them sought medical care. They had difficulty discussing such a sensitive topic with their GP, did not know their problems could be relieved or perceived GPs to have insufficient knowledge of FGM/C. Lack of time during consultations and overall dissatisfaction with Dutch GP care hampered trust. They strongly preferred the GP to be proactive and ask about FGM/C.
Conclusion: There is room for improvement as most women would like their GP to discuss their health problems related to FGM/C. GPs should take a proactive attitude and ask about FGM/C. In addition, to develop the trusted relationship needed to discuss sensitive topics and provide culturally sensitive person-centered care, sufficient time during consultations is needed.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Feb;27(2):161-4. (PMID: 17454465)
Ethn Health. 2012;17(6):677-95. (PMID: 23534507)
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Feb;15(1):86-90. (PMID: 15788809)
Med Educ. 2009 Mar;43(3):229-37. (PMID: 19250349)
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 21;4(11):e006316. (PMID: 25416059)
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Apr;27(4):362-78. (PMID: 16595367)
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 6;13(11):e0206886. (PMID: 30399181)
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:542859. (PMID: 25505915)
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):935-946. (PMID: 27515801)
Birth. 2000 Dec;27(4):227-34. (PMID: 11251507)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Jun;97(3):238-44. (PMID: 17445819)
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018 Jul 20;162:. (PMID: 30182633)
Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1835-41. (PMID: 16753486)
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0211829. (PMID: 30830904)
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Aug;70(4):351-79. (PMID: 23169897)
Int J Public Health. 2012 Apr;57(2):413-20. (PMID: 22314540)
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(6):453-6. (PMID: 19287554)
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):186-91. (PMID: 11236119)

Date Created: 20200708 Date Completed: 20200915 Latest Revision: 20200915

20240105

PMC7340277

10.1371/journal.pone.0235867

32634170