"Worse than I anticipated" or "This isn't so bad"?: The impact of affective forecasting accuracy on self-reported task performance.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Various motivational theories emphasize that desired emotional outcomes guide behavioral choices. Although motivational theory and research has emphasized that behavior is affected by desired emotional outcomes, little research has focused on the impact of anticipated feelings about engaging in behavior. The current research seeks to partly fill that void. Specifically, we borrow from affective forecasting research in suggesting that forecasts about engaging in performance-relevant behaviors can be more or less accurate. Furthermore, we suggest that the degree of accuracy has implications for self-reported task performance. To examine these ideas, we conducted two studies in which individuals made affective predictions about engaging in tasks and then later reported how they actually felt during task engagement. We also assessed their self-reported task performance. In Study 1, 214 workers provided affective forecasts about upcoming work tasks, and in Study 2, 185 students made forecasts about studying for an exam. Results based on polynomial regression were largely consistent across the studies. The accuracy of the forecasts did not conform to the pattern of affective forecasting accuracy typically found outside the performance domain. Furthermore, anticipated and experienced affect jointly predicted self-reported task performance in a consistent manner. Collectively, these findings suggest that taking into account anticipated affect, and its relationship with later experienced affect, provides a more comprehensive account of affect's role in task performance.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1054-68. (PMID: 16316265)
      Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Feb;14(2):143-52. (PMID: 23329161)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):821-36. (PMID: 10821192)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. (PMID: 3397865)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;19(4):196-200. (PMID: 25726365)
      Psychol Bull. 2002 Nov;128(6):934-60. (PMID: 12405138)
      Am J Psychol. 1999 Summer;112(2):297-311. (PMID: 10696276)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1708-12. (PMID: 18665428)
      Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):172-5. (PMID: 11934003)
      Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):649-53. (PMID: 16913944)
      J Exp Psychol Gen. 1987 Mar;116(1):68-81. (PMID: 2951483)
      Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):167-203. (PMID: 18453461)
      Ann Behav Med. 2018 Feb 5;52(2):157-174. (PMID: 29538630)
      J Exp Soc Psychol. 1997 Jul;33(4):421-48. (PMID: 9247371)
      PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0212594. (PMID: 30835762)
      J Appl Psychol. 2002 Dec;87(6):1055-67. (PMID: 12558213)
      J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):162-76. (PMID: 19186902)
      Med Decis Making. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):15-22. (PMID: 19047761)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1198-212. (PMID: 12416922)
      Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):45-52. (PMID: 20417005)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200714 Date Completed: 20200917 Latest Revision: 20200917
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7357752
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0235973
    • Accession Number:
      32658900