Whole body kinematic sex differences persist across non-dimensional gait speeds.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Sex differences in human locomotion are of interest in a broad variety of interdisciplinary applications. Although kinematic sex differences have been studied for many years, the underlying reasons behind several noted differences, such as pelvis and torso range of motion, are still not well understood. Walking speed and body size in particular represent confounding influences that hinder our ability to determine causal factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate sex differences in whole body gait kinematics across a range of controlled, non-dimensional walking and running speeds. We hypothesized that as task demand (i.e. gait speed) increased, the influences of modifiable factors would decrease, leading to a kinematic motion pattern convergence between sexes. Motion capture data from forty-eight healthy young adults (24 M, 24 F) wearing controlled footwear was captured at three walking and three running Froude speeds. Spatiotemporal metrics, center of mass displacement, and joint/segment ranges of motion were compared between sexes using 2x6 mixed-model ANOVAs. Three dimensional time-series waveforms were also used to describe the time-varying behavior of select joint angles. When controlling for size, sex differences in spatiotemporal metrics and center of mass displacement disappeared. However, contrary to our hypothesis, sagittal plane ankle, frontal plane pelvis, and transverse plane pelvis and torso range of motion all displayed sex differences that persisted or increased with gait speed. Overall, most spatiotemporal sex differences appear to be related to size and self-selection of gait speeds, while in contrast, sex differences in joint motion may be more inherent and ubiquitous than previously thought. Discussion on potential causal factors is presented.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      Med Eng Phys. 2012 Jan;34(1):118-22. (PMID: 21890394)
      Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Dec;19(6):834-41. (PMID: 19000103)
      Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):555-62. (PMID: 23489950)
      J Pain. 2009 May;10(5):447-85. (PMID: 19411059)
      J Biomech. 2017 Jun 14;58:11-20. (PMID: 28501342)
      J Biomech. 2011 Jul 7;44(10):1974-9. (PMID: 21601861)
      Physiotherapy. 2015 Sep;101(3):266-72. (PMID: 25702092)
      J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;41(6A):829-34. (PMID: 15685471)
      Am J Hum Biol. 2016 Nov;28(6):913-917. (PMID: 27387424)
      J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Feb 15;7:9. (PMID: 20156364)
      Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):300-3. (PMID: 19013799)
      Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14 Suppl 1:S302-9. (PMID: 24444222)
      Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):441-5. (PMID: 19665379)
      J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953 Jul;35-A(3):543-58. (PMID: 13069544)
      Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jan-Feb;77(1):2-7. (PMID: 9482373)
      Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):54-9. (PMID: 25943408)
      Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):890-7. (PMID: 16262776)
      Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):17-24. (PMID: 16905322)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Dec;23(10):1260-8. (PMID: 18774631)
      Gait Posture. 2016 Jan;43:204-9. (PMID: 26481257)
      J Biomech. 2012 Jun 1;45(9):1692-7. (PMID: 22507350)
      Gait Posture. 2015 Oct;42(4):505-10. (PMID: 26364243)
      J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Aug;99(2):603-8. (PMID: 15845776)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 May;27(4):366-71. (PMID: 22071426)
      Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;300(4):752-763. (PMID: 28297187)
      Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;300(4):739-751. (PMID: 28297175)
      Gait Posture. 2007 Mar;25(3):385-92. (PMID: 16814548)
      Int J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;35(2):153-8. (PMID: 23868680)
      Gait Posture. 2005 Apr;21(3):350-62. (PMID: 15760752)
      Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;300(4):764-775. (PMID: 28297181)
      Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Apr;32(2):279-89. (PMID: 23725827)
      Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970 Nov;51(11):637-50. (PMID: 5501933)
      Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):15-9. (PMID: 9143432)
      Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 7;7(1):17182. (PMID: 29215063)
      Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Nov;17(10):1289-1296. (PMID: 28961074)
      Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2302-8. (PMID: 22365476)
      J Biomech. 2014 Apr 11;47(6):1324-31. (PMID: 24582352)
      J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3360-5. (PMID: 19022448)
      BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 12;17:157. (PMID: 27072641)
      J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S107-10. (PMID: 26506172)
      J Exp Biol. 1988 Jul;137:207-19. (PMID: 3209967)
      Gait Posture. 2008 Apr;27(3):447-54. (PMID: 17616462)
      J Sports Sci. 2017 Aug;35(16):1575-1581. (PMID: 27571504)
      Gait Posture. 2001 Feb;13(1):1-6. (PMID: 11166548)
      Gait Posture. 2010 Apr;31(4):429-32. (PMID: 20163963)
      Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Apr;38(2):105-16. (PMID: 18423331)
      J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Jun;11(5):453-8. (PMID: 12165162)
      PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118903. (PMID: 25760381)
      Gait Posture. 2016 May;46:11-7. (PMID: 27131170)
      J Vis. 2002;2(5):371-87. (PMID: 12678652)
      Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;18:202-208. (PMID: 29141811)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 May;18(4):350-7. (PMID: 12689785)
      Biol Lett. 2005 Sep 22;1(3):338-41. (PMID: 17148201)
      Gait Posture. 2001 Oct;14(2):79-84. (PMID: 11544057)
      Am J Phys Med. 1966 Feb;45(1):8-23. (PMID: 5903893)
      Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;300(4):633-642. (PMID: 28297184)
      Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):540-5. (PMID: 25548119)
      Gait Posture. 2012 Mar;35(3):373-7. (PMID: 22098825)
      Phys Ther. 1989 Nov;69(11):897-901. (PMID: 2813517)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Jun;19(5):465-72. (PMID: 15182981)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Dec;27(10):1052-7. (PMID: 22948078)
      Gait Posture. 2018 Sep;65:234-239. (PMID: 30558937)
      Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):136-44. (PMID: 19154840)
      Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3175-85. (PMID: 26195171)
      Ann Hum Biol. 2005 Jan-Feb;32(1):44-59. (PMID: 15788354)
      J Orthop Sci. 2016 Nov;21(6):804-809. (PMID: 27727048)
      Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Dec;143(4):601-11. (PMID: 20623603)
      Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Feb;27(2):203-208. (PMID: 26662224)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Feb;19(2):145-52. (PMID: 14967577)
      J Exp Biol. 2009 Feb;212(Pt 4):523-34. (PMID: 19181900)
      Gait Posture. 2014 Jan;39(1):105-10. (PMID: 23830524)
      J Biomech. 1983;16(7):523-37. (PMID: 6619170)
      Age Ageing. 2010 Sep;39(5):647-50. (PMID: 20558480)
      Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Oct;49:104-15. (PMID: 27367784)
      Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Jun;16(5):438-45. (PMID: 11390052)
      J Biomech. 2008;41(8):1639-50. (PMID: 18466909)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200821 Date Completed: 20201008 Latest Revision: 20201008
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7440644
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0237449
    • Accession Number:
      32817696