The impact of a physician's recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation.

Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9815926 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1369-7625 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13696513 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Expect Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Wiley, c1998-

Physicians*; Attitude ; Decision Making ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Research Design

Objective: This study examined the influence of physicians' recommendations and gender on the decision-making process in a preference-sensitive situation.
Methods: N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence.
Results: Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants' attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants' decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments.
Conclusion: This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences.
(© 2020 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 03;4:CD011166. (PMID: 27039329)
Yale J Biol Med. 2016 Jun 27;89(2):131-42. (PMID: 27354840)
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e013272. (PMID: 28188153)
Med Glas (Zenica). 2011 Feb;8(1):39-45. (PMID: 21263393)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):405-20. (PMID: 26645531)
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):552-557. (PMID: 29048317)
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):269-281. (PMID: 33274816)
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. (PMID: 25351843)
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):240-6. (PMID: 20542403)
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):23-31. (PMID: 21323824)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):699-706. (PMID: 21471491)
Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):347-51. (PMID: 18603576)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431. (PMID: 28402085)
BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):318-22. (PMID: 9924064)
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1172-9. (PMID: 26215573)
J Particip Med. 2018 Nov 22;10(4):e12338. (PMID: 33052125)
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. (PMID: 21474265)
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep - Oct;75(5):1140-1148. (PMID: 29402668)
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1419-39. (PMID: 12479504)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 12;20(2):e47. (PMID: 29434017)
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 May 18;11:947-958. (PMID: 28572722)
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):452-455. (PMID: 28069491)
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):270-5. (PMID: 24821899)
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14(1):84-91. (PMID: 20860780)
Med Care. 2011 Jul;49(7):611-7. (PMID: 21478782)
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):48-51. (PMID: 11139312)
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. (PMID: 7898294)
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92. (PMID: 9032835)
Int Orthop. 2011 Apr;35(4):607-13. (PMID: 21127860)
Psychol Health Med. 2020 Mar;25(3):259-269. (PMID: 31707838)
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):305-12. (PMID: 21620326)
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Jan;37:1-6. (PMID: 27712953)
Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219-26. (PMID: 18418028)
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. (PMID: 22375967)
JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):756-64. (PMID: 12169083)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):627-9. (PMID: 27044962)
Psychooncology. 2006 Jan;15(1):9-19. (PMID: 15669023)
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Dec 24;115(51-52):855-862. (PMID: 30765021)
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004 May;15(2):294-306. (PMID: 15253380)
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Nov;17(4):285-94. (PMID: 10606197)
JMIR Cancer. 2015 Sep 08;1(2):e10. (PMID: 28410160)
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Jun;25(3):102-108. (PMID: 31473598)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 03;(3):CD010523. (PMID: 25733495)
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):845-851. (PMID: 27860037)
Med Decis Making. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):262-71. (PMID: 12058783)
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):56-69. (PMID: 27510740)
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. (PMID: 23281971)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 10;20(12):e11682. (PMID: 30530450)
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(19):1699-1704. (PMID: 7178916)
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):99-108. (PMID: 11359540)
Science. 2016 Apr 22;352(6284):413-4. (PMID: 27102467)

Keywords: attitude; decision satisfaction; gender; medical decision making; physiotherapy; recommendations; surgery

Date Created: 20201204 Date Completed: 20211001 Latest Revision: 20211001

20240104

PMC8077152

10.1111/hex.13161

33274816