The geographical maldistribution of obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
      Gynecology* ; Obstetrics*; Physicians/*supply & distribution; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Physicians, Women/supply & distribution
    • Abstract:
      Background: In Japan, there is a large geographical maldistribution of obstetricians/gynecologists, with a high proportion of females. This study seeks to clarify how the increase in the proportion of female physicians affects the geographical maldistribution of obstetrics/gynecologists.
      Methods: Governmental data of the Survey of Physicians, Dentists and Pharmacists between 1996 and 2016 were used. The Gini coefficient was used to measure the geographical maldistribution. We divided obstetricians/gynecologists into four groups based on age and gender: males under 40 years, females under 40 years, males aged 40 years and above, and females aged 40 years and above, and the time trend of the maldistribution and contribution of each group was evaluated.
      Results: The maldistribution of obstetricians/gynecologists was found to be worse during the study period, with the Gini coefficient exceeding 0.400 in 2016. The contribution ratios of female physicians to the deterioration of geographical maldistribution have been increasing for those under 40 years and those aged 40 years and above. However, there was a continuous decrease in the Gini coefficient of the two groups.
      Conclusions: The increase in the contribution ratio of the female physician groups to the Gini coefficient in obstetrics/gynecology may be due to the increased weight of these groups. The Gini coefficients of the female groups were also found to be on a decline. Although this may be because the working environment for female physicians improved or more female physicians established their practice in previously underserved areas, such a notion needs to be investigated in a follow-up study.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):164-6. (PMID: 19733111)
      J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Jun;41(6):919-25. (PMID: 25546654)
      Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1070. (PMID: 19463042)
      Lancet. 1992 Dec 5;340(8832):1391-3. (PMID: 1360099)
      Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020;251(1):1-8. (PMID: 32378519)
      Int J Equity Health. 2009 Mar 03;8:5. (PMID: 19257879)
      J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Aug;35(4):761-6. (PMID: 19751339)
      BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):288. (PMID: 27829461)
      BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 8;8(1):e018538. (PMID: 29317415)
      Hum Resour Health. 2013 Aug 27;11:41. (PMID: 23981198)
      Health Policy. 2010 Aug;96(3):255-61. (PMID: 20236722)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210112 Date Completed: 20210611 Latest Revision: 20210611
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7802964
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0245385
    • Accession Number:
      33434232