Prevalence and characteristics of childfree adults in Michigan (USA).

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Personality/*physiology; Data Collection ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Michigan/epidemiology ; Parents ; Prevalence ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Childfree individuals choose not to have children, which makes them a distinctive group from parents who have had children, not-yet-parents who plan to have children, and childless indivduals who would have liked to have children. Most research on parental status and psychosocial characteristics has not effectively distinguished childfree individuals from other non-parents or has relied on non-representative samples. In this study, we use a representative sample of 981 Michigan adults to estimate the prevalence of childfree individuals, to examine how childfree individuals differ from parents and other types of non-parents in life satisfaction, political ideology, and personality, and to examine whether childfree individuals are viewed as an outgroup. We find that over a quarter of Michigan adults identified as childfree. After controlling for demographic characteristics, we find no differences in life satisfaction and limited differences in personality traits between childfree individuals and parents, not-yet-parents, or childless individuals. However, childfree individuals were more liberal than parents, and those who have or want(ed) children felt substantially less warm toward childfree individuals than childfree individuals felt toward each other. Given the prevalence of childfree individuals, the risks of their outgroup status, and their potential role in politics as a uniquely liberal group, it is important for demographic research to distinguish the childfree from others and to better understand these individuals.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Soc Biol. 1988 Fall-Winter;35(3-4):186-97. (PMID: 3241988)
Soc Forces. 2019 Jun;97(4):1571-1602. (PMID: 31354175)
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. (PMID: 16367493)
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2343. (PMID: 30542312)
Psychol Women Q. 1979 Winter;4(2):266-73. (PMID: 12262530)
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Aug;50(4):309-15. (PMID: 19302413)
Dev Psychol. 2013 Apr;49(4):749-61. (PMID: 22686177)
J Fam Issues. 1982 Dec;3(4):517-43. (PMID: 12264680)
Soc Biol. 1991 Spring-Summer;38(1-2):79-93. (PMID: 1749968)
Natl Health Stat Report. 2012 Apr 12;(51):1-28. (PMID: 22803225)
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):299-302. (PMID: 24220628)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):218-30. (PMID: 19210076)
Int J Sociol Fam. 1986 Spring;16(1):95-110. (PMID: 12268864)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;45(9):1378-1390. (PMID: 30819043)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7696-7701. (PMID: 32205428)
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):835-41. (PMID: 22722269)
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):3-10. (PMID: 23201970)
Gerontologist. 1993 Oct;33(5):630-6. (PMID: 8225007)
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):192-203. (PMID: 16768595)
Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):309-312. (PMID: 32412686)
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2002;54(2):89-106. (PMID: 12054274)
Psychol Bull. 2014 May;140(3):846-895. (PMID: 24491021)

Date Created: 20210616 Date Completed: 20211110 Latest Revision: 20240402

20240402

PMC8208578

10.1371/journal.pone.0252528

34133450