Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Conservation of Natural Resources*/methods ; Endangered Species*; Animals ; Retrospective Studies ; Trigger Points

Many endangered species exist in only a single population, and almost all species that go extinct will do so from their last remaining population. Understanding how to best conserve these single population threatened species (SPTS) is therefore a distinct and important task for threatened species conservation science. As a last resort, managers of SPTS may consider taking the entire population into captivity-ex situ, in toto conservation. In the past, this choice has been taken to the great benefit of the SPTS, but it has also lead to catastrophe. Here, we develop a decision-support tool for planning when to trigger this difficult action. Our method considers the uncertain and ongoing decline of the SPTS, the possibility that drastic ex situ action will fail, and the opportunities offered by delaying the decision. Specifically, these benefits are additional time for ongoing in situ actions to succeed, and opportunities for the managers to learn about the system. To illustrate its utility, we apply the decision tool to four retrospective case-studies of declining SPTS. As well as offering support to this particular decision, our tool illustrates why trigger points for difficult conservation decisions should be formulated in advance, but must also be adaptive. A trigger-point for the ex situ, in toto conservation of a SPTS, for example, will not take the form of a simple threshold abundance.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):599-609. (PMID: 26306549)
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Oct;10(10):430. (PMID: 21237093)
Ecol Appl. 2009 Mar;19(2):515-26. (PMID: 19323207)
Front Ecol Environ. 2013 Dec 1;11(10):556-564. (PMID: 24891843)
Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):852-61. (PMID: 18616746)
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):956-63. (PMID: 17650246)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jun;26(6):307-16. (PMID: 21458878)
Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):199-207. (PMID: 22443127)
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 May;15(3):505-13. (PMID: 22882447)
J Biosci. 2002 Jul;27(4 Suppl 2):385-92. (PMID: 12177536)

Date Created: 20220407 Date Completed: 20220414 Latest Revision: 20231103

20240105

PMC8989361

10.1371/journal.pone.0266244

35390021