Teaching design thinking as a tool to address complex public health challenges in public health students: a case study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088679 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6920 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726920 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Med Educ Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

COVID-19* ; Students, Public Health*; Curriculum ; Humans ; Learning ; Public Health

Background: Developing a public health workforce that can understand problems from a population perspective is essential in the design of impactful user-centred responses to current population health challenges. Design Thinking, a user-driven process for problem-defining and solution-finding, not only has utility in the field of public health but stands as a potential mechanism for developing critical skills -such as empathy, creativity and innovation- amongst future professionals. Though the literature reflects the use of DT across many health sciences disciplines, less research has been published on how students apply learned concepts using real-world challenges of their choice and what difficulties they face during the process.
Methods: This case study evaluates achieved learning outcomes after the introduction of a design thinking block into post-graduate public health curriculum at the University College Dublin. Two independent assessors evaluated student learning outcomes and observed difficulties during the process by assessing group presentations to identify and understand any learning difficulties using an ad-hoc designed tool. The tool consisted of twelve items scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Student feedback, in the form of an online survey, was also analysed to determine their level of enjoyment, perceived learning outcomes and opinions on the course content.
Results: The assessors evaluated thirteen DT group presentations and reports from 50 students. The groups chose a range of topics from socialization of college students during Covid-19 to mental health challenges in a low-income country. Independent assessment of assignments revealed that the highest scores were reached by groups who explored a challenge relevant to their own lives (more than 80% of total possible points versus 60% class average). The groups that explored challenges more distant to themselves struggled with problem finding with a mean score of 2.05 (SD ± 1.2) out of 5 in that domain. The greatest difficulties were observed in problem finding and ideation. Though most students found the design thinking block enjoyable and relevant to their education, they recommended that the DT block be a stand-alone module. Students recognized that groups who chose a familiar topic experienced fewer difficulties throughout the process.
Conclusion: The study showed that DT learning outcomes were best achieved when students focused on challenges, they had either personally experienced or were familiar with. These findings provide insight for future iterations of DT workshops and support the teaching of user-centred approaches to future public health practitioners.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)

Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):683-688. (PMID: 31761941)
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e317. (PMID: 27986647)
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0186744. (PMID: 29091935)
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2017 Mar 1;48(3):102-103. (PMID: 28253415)
Design Health (Abingdon). 2018;2(2):236-252. (PMID: 31773070)
BMJ Open. 2021 May 6;11(5):e047512. (PMID: 33958343)
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):40-44. (PMID: 27438158)
Acad Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(10):1417-1420. (PMID: 30867087)
Inf Technol Dev. 2019 Sep 29;26(3):477-505. (PMID: 32982007)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. (PMID: 30264690)
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 22;21(1):292. (PMID: 34020647)
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Mar;4(1):11-4. (PMID: 27001093)
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Mar/Apr;25 Suppl 2, Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey 2:S96-S102. (PMID: 30720622)
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):501-508. (PMID: 32847450)
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;8:459. (PMID: 32984247)
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1234-8. (PMID: 27097052)
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):269. (PMID: 30458759)
Front Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;5:46. (PMID: 28373970)
J Med Syst. 2016 Jul;40(7):177. (PMID: 27277278)
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2009 Fall;8(3):172-81. (PMID: 19723812)

Keywords: Design thinking; Human-centred design; Learning outcomes; Public health

Date Created: 20220413 Date Completed: 20220414 Latest Revision: 20220429

20240105

PMC9002025

10.1186/s12909-022-03334-6

35413916