Similarity and Contact Frequency Promote Mentorship Quality among Hispanic Undergraduates in STEM.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Society for Cell Biology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101269039 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1931-7913 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19317913 NLM ISO Abbreviation: CBE Life Sci Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Bethesda, MD : American Society for Cell Biology, c2006-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Mentoring relationships can be important for promoting the success and persistence of undergraduates, particularly for students from historically underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. While mentoring is often cited as important for attracting and retaining students from underrepresented groups in STEM, little is known about the differential mentoring processes that can result from similar and dissimilar mentor-protégé pairs. The present study tests the process-oriented mentorship model (POMM) regarding how mentor-protégé similarities and the moderating role of contact frequency influence mentorship quality and STEM research career persistence intentions among faculty-mentored Hispanic STEM majors in their senior year of college. The results indicate that mentor-protégé similarity matters. Specifically, higher levels of mentor-protégé psychological similarity were related to higher levels of psychosocial support and relationship satisfaction. Hispanic students with a Hispanic faculty mentor reported engaging in more coauthoring opportunities than peers with non-Hispanic mentors. Among those with higher contact frequency, students with same-gender mentors had higher levels of relationship satisfaction than peers with different-gender mentors; however, there were no differences among those with low contact frequency. Additionally, protégés who reported coauthoring support were more likely to also report commitment to pursuing a STEM research career.
    • References:
      J Appl Psychol. 1994 Apr;79(2):211-23. (PMID: 8206814)
      CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3):. (PMID: 27543635)
      Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;139(2):441-76. (PMID: 22800296)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):635-646. (PMID: 22746674)
      J Vocat Behav. 2008 Apr;72(2):254-267. (PMID: 19343074)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12240-2. (PMID: 26392553)
      CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1):. (PMID: 29351912)
      Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2011 Mar 1;33(1):. (PMID: 24285910)
      Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Sep;1499(1):54-69. (PMID: 33890307)
      Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. (PMID: 19565683)
      J Educ Psychol. 2011 Feb 1;103(1):206-222. (PMID: 21552374)
      J Exp Educ. 2017;85(3):450-468. (PMID: 30381776)
      Bioscience. 2019 May 1;69(5):389-397. (PMID: 31086422)
      CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Mar;19(1):ar11. (PMID: 32108559)
      PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238250. (PMID: 32936827)
      CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3):. (PMID: 27543633)
      J Appl Psychol. 1988 May;73(2):228-34. (PMID: 3384773)
    • Grant Information:
      R01 GM075316 United States GM NIGMS NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220422 Date Completed: 20220426 Latest Revision: 20221001
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC9508928
    • Accession Number:
      10.1187/cbe.21-10-0305
    • Accession Number:
      35452264