Menu
×
Main Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 588-2001
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 883-3914
John's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
McClellanville Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Edisto Library
9 a.m. - 3 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
Main Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 588-2001
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 883-3914
John's Island Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
McClellanville Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Edisto Library
9 a.m. - 3 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Impact of field fungal contamination of barley on ensiling properties, nutritional quality and the microbiome of barley silage.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Nair, Jayakrishnan; Turkington, T. Kelly; Blackshaw, Robert; Geddes, Charles M.; Lupwayi, Newton Z.; Xu, Shanwei; Yang, Jinli; Yang, Hee‐Eun; Wang, Yuxi; McAllister, Tim A.
- Source:
Grass & Forage Science; Jun2019, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p231-243, 13p- Subject Terms:
- Source:
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract: Barley varieties of differing fungal disease resistance were grown in triplicate plots at Lacombe and Lethbridge, Alberta with the disease resistant variety (FR) sprayed with a foliar fungicide to maximize differences in field fungal disease. Both varieties were harvested at soft dough and ensiled in minisilos to assess differences in fungal contamination on ensiling properties, nutritional quality, aerobic stability and associated bacterial and fungal microbiomes. Data were analysed as repeated measures with the effect of treatment × time (duration of ensiling or aerobic exposure) included in the model. The percentage leaf area diseased by net form net blotch was higher (p < 0.05) in the untreated barley cv. Sundre (UN, 59.1% leaf area affected at Lacombe and 25.2% at Lethbridge) than in the FR barley cv. Chigwell (0.7% leaf area affected at Lacombe and 0.1% at Lethbridge). Fungal resistant barley had a lower (p < 0.01) acid and neutral detergent fibre content. Relative abundance of Xanthomonadales was higher (p = 0.02) for FR than UN, while Lactobacillales dominated the bacterial microbiome after 60 day of ensiling in both silages. Bacillales dominated both FR and UN after 21 day of aerobic exposure. Fungal resistant fresh barley forage had a tendency (p = 0.10) for a greater relative abundance of Pleosporales, while UN had higher (p < 0.01) Hypocreales. Mould counts were lower (p = 0.01) for FR than UN after 7 day of ensiling. Fungal resistant barley had minimal influence on the fungal community that contributed to the aerobic deterioration of barley silage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract: Copyright of Grass & Forage Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.