Counselling psychologists' anti-discriminatory awareness and practice in the UK: Exploring the relationship between self-awareness of beliefs and attitudes in relation to difference and diversity and therapeutic practice.

Background & Aims: Research suggests that a therapist who works dynamically with their own explicit and implicit beliefs and attitudes, sourced in their own multilayered lived experience, may be better able to appreciate, and more accurately perceive, a clients' lived experience. This study aims to explore counselling psychologists' narratives around anti-discriminatory practice and to examine how counselling psychologists utilise self-awareness to make meaning of and to address the influence of potentially biasing explicit and implicit beliefs, on the therapeutic process in relation to difference and diversity. Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with six qualified counselling psychologists who graduated from UK-based counselling psychology doctoral programmes within five years previous to the study. Verbatim transcripts of the interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Findings: The analysis produced three master themes: 'Views toward anti-discriminatory practice'; 'Reflections on self-awareness of beliefs and attitudes in relation to difference and diversity'; and 'Actively working with difference and diversity in the therapy room'. Conclusion: The findings substantiate counselling psychologist's multifaceted and critical stance on anti-discriminatory practice. Participants were conscious of and sensitive to the relationship between self-awareness of potentially biasing beliefs and attitudes in relation to difference and diversity and therapeutic practice. Moreover, the findings suggest that core humanistic therapeutic skills, when aided by self-awareness and a reflective practice, can monitor potentially biasing and prejudicial attitudes in Counselling Psychology practice, thus providing a foundation for ADP from a counselling psychology perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Counselling Psychology Review is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)