Deciding How to Decide: Cultural Theory and Rule Making in Collaborative Watershed Organizations.

The growing field of collaborative governance has long sought to explain processes of collective decision making. Insights from institutional analysis highlight the influence of rules in shaping collective decisions. Yet, less is known about how such rules are created; in other words, how collaborative organizations decide how to decide. By drawing on concepts from Cultural Theory, we examine the connections between worldviews and decision rules across four collaborative watershed organizations in Ohio, United States. Results from this comparative case analysis indicate correlations between the group dimension of worldview and decision rules about choice, as well as between the grid dimension of worldview and two different types of decision rules, choice and aggregation. These results highlight the explanatory value of integrating aspects of Cultural Theory with the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Results also suggest how governments might more effectively engage with collaborative organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

长期以来，协同治理领域不断寻求对集体决策过程进行解释。制度分析的见解突出了规则在塑造集体决策上的影响。然而，我们对于这样的规则是如何产生的，或者说，协同组织如何决定他们的决策，却知之甚少。通过借鉴文化理论中的概念，我们研究了俄亥俄州中部四个协同流域组织的世界观和其决策规则之间的联系。该比较案例分析的结果表明，世界观的群体维数与选择的决策规则之间具有相关性，世界观的网格维数与两种不同类型的决策规则、选择和聚集之间也具有相关性。这些结果突出了将文化理论的各个方面和制度分析与发展框架相结合的解释价值。此外，我们的结果还显示了政府怎样才能更有效地与协同组织合作。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Policy Studies Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)