'Sonder eenige ordre van 't recht te onderhouden...' Een analyse van een zaak van recursus ad principem voor de Raad van Brabant in het begin van de 18de eeuw: bezitsvordering of buitengewoon rechtsmiddel? (German)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      NETHERLANDS; FRANCE; SPAIN
    • Subject Terms:
      VAN de Nesse, Willem
    • Abstract:
      The present article discusses the case of Willem Van de Nesse, a parish priest, and archbishop Precipiano, his canonical superior. Precipiano had suspended Van de Nesse, however without following due canonical procedure. The Council of Brabant took jurisdiction of the case. It decided that Precipiano had violated Van de Nesses rights of peaceful possession because he had not respected the requirements of canonical procedure. The Council maintained Van de Nesse in the possession of his parish. This case serves as a starting point for a description of the evolution of the recursus ad principem in the Netherlands, and for a comparison with similar procedures in France (the appel comme d'abus) and in Spain (the recurso de fuerza). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Legal History Review is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)