Asset Price Regulators, Unite: You have the Macroeconomy to Win and the Microeconomic Losses are Small.

The global financial crisis (GFC) has rekindled debate about the desirability of governmental interference in asset markets - either through the operation of policy levers, or through the chosen institutional setup. In this article, we quantify economic costs because of mispricing of real assets in the USAGE model of the USA. The microeconomic costs of misallocated capital are small. The model suggests that regulators (or central banks) who risk mispricing by influencing asset prices do so without incurring large economic costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Economic Record is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)