STAVOVI STUDENATA O KOHABITACIJI I BRAKU. (Bosnian)

EINSTELLUNGEN DER STUDENTEN ZUR KOHABITATION UND EHE. (German)
STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARD COHABITATION AND MARRIAGE. (English)

The aim of empirical research presented in this paper was to examine students' attitudes toward cohabita-tion and maniage. Convenience sampling ivas used to select 4.17 students between 18 and 36years of age. Students were asked to mark their responses on the "Scale for measuring attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage", which consisted of 17 statements. Overall, students have moderately positive attitudes towards cohabitation. A statistically significant difference ivas found between the majority of students who favor attitudes towards cohabitation as a preparation for marriage and those who view cohabitation as a form of permanent living arrangements between partners. There was no statistically significant difference between female and male students in attitudes toward cohabitation. Regarding other socio-demographic variables, the degree of reli-giosity was a statistically significant predictor so that extremely religious students expressed least favorable attitudes toward cohabitation. Students have ambivalent attitudes toward marriage, with 60.4% who think that "marriage is not an outdated institution" and 68% who find it "acceptable for an unmarried couple to live together even without the intention of ever getting married". Male students are more inclined to agree with the statements that "living together before marriage improves couple's chances for a happy marriage" and that "marriage is an outdated institution". Female students are more likely to agree with the statement that "good marriage and family life are extremely important". Female students also express some of their concerns by agreeing more with the statement that "there are not many successfid and happy marriages today so one must wonder whether it is the right way of life". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In der vorliegenden Arbeit iverden Ergebnisse der Forschung präsentiert, die es zum Ziel hatte, die Eistellun-gen der Studenten zur Kohabitation und Ehe zu erforschen. An der Forschung haben 417 Studentinnen und Studenten im Alter voit 18 bis 36 Jahren teilgenommen. Studenten als Gruppe vertreten eine moderat positive Eistellung zur Kohabitation, wobei sie sich wesentlich positiver zur Kohabitation als Vorbereitung auf die Ehe äußern, als zur Kohabitation als eine Dauerform des Partnerlebens. Der Unterschied in der Einstellung zur Kohabitation zwischen männlichen mid weiblichen Teilnehmern ist statistisch nicht relevant. Unter anderen soziodemografischen Variablen hat sich nur eine betonte Religiosität als statistisch relevant unter den Teilnehmern gezeigt, dabei vertreten die Teilnehmer, die sich selbst als ausgesprochen religiös bezeichnen, die am wenigsten positive Einstellungen zur Kohabitation. Die Teilnehmer vertreten eine ambivalente Einstellung zur Ehe, wobei 60,4% aller Teilnehmer finden, dass die Institution der Ehe überhaupt nicht veraltet ist, während aufder anderen Seite 68% es für völlig akzep-tabel halten, dass ein Paar zusammen lebt, auch wenn es nicht die Absicht hat zu heiraten. Studenten sind eher als Studentinnen dazu geneigt, mit der Aussage einverstanden zu sein, dass das ge-meinsame Leben vor der Heirat die Chancen des Paares auf eine glückliche Fortsetzung in Form der Ehe erhöht, bzw. dass die Ehe eine veraltete Institution ist. Studentinnen sind eher mit Aussagen einverstanden, dass eine gute Ehe und Familienleben ausgesprochen wichtig sind, sie drücken aber auch ihre Besorgnis aus, indem sie mit der Aussage einverstanden sind, dass man heutzutage nur wenig gute und glückliche Ehen sehen kann, sodass man sich fragen muss, ob dies eine richtige Form des Lebens ist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

U radu seprezentiraju rezultati istraživanja stavova studenata o kohabitaciji i braku. Ispitane su i ra-zlike u stavovima skupina formiranih na temelju odabranih demografikih obilježja ispitanika. Radi se o prigodnom uzorku sudionika koji su ispunili „Skalu stava o kohabitaciji i braku " koja sadrži 17 ¿estica. U istraživanju je sudjelovalo 417 studentica i studenata u dobi od 18 do 36godina. Štu-denti kao skupina zastupaju umjereno pozitivan stav o kohabitaciji, a pritom se značajno pozitivnije izjašnjavaju o kohabitaciji kao pripremi za brak negó o kohabitaciji kao trajnom obliku partnerskog života. Razlika u stavu o kohabitaciji izmedu ženskih i muških sudionika istraživanja nije statistički značajna. Od ostalih sociodemografikih varijabli jedino se izražen stupanj religioznosti pokazao kao područje statistički značajne razlike medu sudionicima, s tim da oni sudionici koji se izjašnjava-ju izrazito religioznima zastupaju najmanje pozitívne stavové o kohabitaciji. Sudionici zastupaju ambivalentan stav o braku, pri čemu 60,4% svih sudionika smatra da brak uopče nije zastarjela institucija dok, s druge strane, njih 68% smatra kako je potpuno prihvatljivo da par živi zajedno iako nemajú nikakvu namjeru vjenčati se. Usporedbom rodnih razlika na razini pojedinih čestica, u četiri čestice sudionici i sudionice statistički se značajno razlikuju. Študenti su značajno skloniji nego studentice složiti se s izjavama da če „zajednički životprije braka poboljšati šanse parova za nastavak sretnog braka", odnosno da je „brak zastarjela institucija". Studentice se pak više slažu s izjavom da su „dobar brak i obiteljski život izuzetno vážni " te izražavaju i svoju zabrinutost slažuči se s izjavom kako „danas vidimo tako malo dobrih i sretnih brakova, da sepitamo je li to ispravan način života". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Socijalna Ekologija is the property of Croatian Sociological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)