A Comparative Study of LIS Accreditation Frameworks in Australia, New Zealand, United States, and Canada

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Gibbons, Leisa; White, Hollie
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 2019 60(4):241-264.
  • Publication Date:
    2019
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Information Analyses
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      Association for Library and Information Science Education. 4 Lan Drive Suite 310, Westford, MA 01886. Tel: 978-674-6190; Fax: 978-250-1117; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: https://www.alise.org/jelis-2
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      24
    • Education Level:
      Higher Education
      Postsecondary Education
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • ISSN:
      0748-5786
    • Abstract:
      As Library and Information Science (LIS) educators, we teach our students about the changing and evolving role of the information professional in the twenty-first century. For many educators around the world, accreditation of LIS programs also shapes and legitimizes curriculum. This comparative study of the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand seeks to identify similarities and differences in accreditation frameworks. This research shows that similarities and differences exist in programs, course designs, delivery methods, accreditation models, program specializations, and engagement with information science as a discipline. In conclusion we ask five critical questions about Australian LIS education and propose three areas for future research, including evaluating the purpose of accreditation.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Publication Date:
      2019
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1232905