"A New Israel" Colonial Comparisons and the Algerian Partition That Never Happened.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): ASSERAF, ARTHUR
  • Source:
    French Historical Studies. Feb2018, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p95-120. 26p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      In 1960-62 French officials considered partitioning Algeria between Europeanand Muslim-majority areas, much later and more seriously than the existing historiography shows. Even supporters of partition, however, remained ambivalent, regarding it as a "foreign" approach to decolonization opposed to French principles of territorial unity and racial equality. Thus they discussed partition by comparing Algeria to foreign models, in particular the partition of the British Mandate of Palestine that led to the creation of the state of Israel. Drawing on the private papers of Prime Minister Michel Debré, the writings of Alain Peyrefitte, and archives from the Ministries of Algerian and Foreign Affairs, this article argues that partition plans were failed attempts to deflect colonialism by looking sideways. To do so, the supporters of partition made use of comparison, a long-standing tool of the colonial administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of French Historical Studies is the property of Duke University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)