SECRET SEARCHES: THE SCA’S STANDING CONUNDRUM.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Halpern, Aviv S.
  • Source:
    Michigan Law Review. Jun2019, Vol. 117 Issue 8, p1697-1721. 25p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) arms federal law enforcement agencies with the ability to use a special type of warrant to access users’ electronically stored communications In some circumstances, SCA warrants can require service providers to bundle and produce a user’s electronically stored communications without ever disclosing the existence of the warrant to the individual user until charges are brought Users that are charged will ultimately receive notice of the search after the fact through their legal proceedings Users that are never charged, however, may never know that their communications were obtained and searched This practice effectively makes the provisions of the SCA that allow for nondisclosure unreviewable by the judiciary Users that were searched but not charged have standing to challenge the scope of these warrants, but receive no notice that the search occurred Service providers receive notice, but have no standing on behalf of their users under the Fourth Amendment This Note argues that the nondisclosure orders therefore create a procedural due process violation in addition to a Fourth Amendment violation Users may have their privacy and property interests infringed without a meaningful opportunity to be heard Under a due process theory, as opposed to a Fourth Amendment theory, this practice can finally be judicially reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Michigan Law Review is the property of Michigan Law Review Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)