The Impact of Anger on the Intimate Partner Violence Decision-Making Process.

ANALYSIS of variance; ANGER; DECISION making; INTERVIEWING; MATHEMATICAL models; MEN; PSYCHOLOGICAL tests; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION analysis; SELF-evaluation; QUALITATIVE research; THEORY; DYADIC analysis (Social sciences); RANDOMIZED controlled trials; REPEATED measures design; INTIMATE partner violence

McFall's (, ) Social Information Processing (SIP) model outlines different stages in cognitive processing and decision-making that may be deficient in men who engage in interpersonal violence (IPV). A decision-making task was developed to assess the utility of abusive and nonabusive behaviors among 32 men who engage in mild IPV, 32 maritally distressed men, and 32 nondistressed men. Because anger impacts appraisal and decision-making (e.g., Lerner and Tiedens in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115-137, ), all participants were randomly assigned to an anger induction or neutral induction condition. As hypothesized, the perceived utility for abusive behavior was greater for angry abusive men and the perceived utility of control appeared to significantly contribute to this difference. Specific deficits in the IPV group were found, supporting a SIP model of IPV, aiding in understanding the function of violent behavior. Despite study limitations, these findings have implications for enhancing specific skill training components of treatment for abusive men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Family Violence is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)