Messy but Fair: The ACA's Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program and the Notice-and-Comment Process.

VALUE-based healthcare; BENCHMARKING (Management); CONFLICT of interests; HEALTH care reform; MEDICAL quality control; PUBLIC opinion; CENTERS for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.); GOVERNMENT regulation; PATIENT Protection & Affordable Care Act; MEDICAL laws

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) promulgated a new Medicare program called the Value-Based Purchasing Program (VBPP) as part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA). Like many other regulatory agencies, CMS used the Notice-and-Comment process to issue proposed rules, solicit public comments, and then publish final rules. Conventional literature suggests that CMS should disproportionately favor business interests during the Notice-and-Comment process, mainly due to the business interests' greater resources and capacity to draft well-reasoned comments. However, this article argues against this presumption and contends instead that CMS listens equally well to both business interest comments and private citizen comments during the formation of the VBPP. With regard to the VBPP and the ACA, CMS appears to be resisting disproportionate sway by business interests and is instead privileging the ACA's goal of improving healthcare quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Legal Medicine is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)