A recipe for increasing racial and gender disparities in HIV infection: A critical analysis of the Canadian guideline on pre-exposure prophylaxis and non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis' responsiveness to the HIV epidemics among women and Black communities

HIV prevention; HIV infection risk factors; BLACK people; HEALTH services accessibility; HEALTH status indicators; MEDICAL care; MEDICAL consultants; MEDICAL personnel; PREVENTIVE medicine; PATIENTS; RACE; SEX distribution; WOMEN'S health; DISEASE incidence; PATIENT-centered care

Clinical guidelines have emerged as an important tool for improving healthcare quality and controlling healthcare costs. However, they also have the potential to limit access to treatment and services for those who could greatly benefit. In November 2017, a clinical guideline for prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. After careful review, we determined the current Canadian PrEP guideline is not wholly inclusive and lacks sufficient sensitivity for detecting HIV seroconversion risk in African, Caribbean, and Canadian Black (Black) communities, as well as women. In this article, we present several scenarios to illustrate how the Canadian guideline for HIV PrEP compromises patient-centered HIV prevention for Black communities and women and may imperil efforts to reduce HIV incidence in these communities. As it stands, the current PrEP Canadian guideline omits the behavioural, clinical, and social factors known to contribute to HIV risk, which also disproportionately affect Black communities. We recommend that healthcare providers, who opt to consult the guideline, exercise clinical discretion, and consider relevant contextual information about the patient presenting for care. However, for a greater impact, the existing guideline should be revised or supplemented with additional recommendations to ensure equitable access for all individuals who would benefit from PrEP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)