The relationship between plasma clozapine concentration and clinical outcome: a cross‐sectional study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: There is no report that statistically evaluates the therapeutic reference (350–600 ng/ml) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) range (>1000 ng/ml) of clozapine (CLZ) recommended by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) consensus guidelines in an isolated and large sampling study. Methods: We administered CLZ to 131 Japanese patients with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia in a multicenter cross‐sectional study. Plasma CLZ concentrations were assayed by high‐performance liquid chromatography using trough sampling. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and severe dose‐dependent ADR (sedation, myoclonus, and seizures) were analyzed statistically after adjusting for possible confounders. Results: The daily CLZ dosage showed a moderately positive relationship with the plasma concentration (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). Every 100 ng/ml increase in plasma CLZ concentration improved the total BPRS score 1.95% (95% CI: 0.89–3.01, p < 0.001) and the odds ratio (OR) 1.38 (95% CI: 1.14–1.66, p = 0.001) for BPRS response. Compared with concentrations below 350 ng/ml CLZ, 350–600 ng/ml (11.12%; 95% CI: 2.52–19.72, p = 0.012) and 600–1000 ng/ml (11.05%; 95% CI: 2.40–19.71, p = 0.013) showed significant improvement in the total BPRS score. Dosages above 1000 ng/ml showed greater improvement (25.36%; 95% CI: 13.08–37.64, p < 0.001) of the total BPRS score but more severe ADRs than dosages below 1000 ng/ml (OR: 31.72; 95% CI: 1.04–968.81, p = 0.048). Conclusion: The AGNP therapeutic reference range (350–600 ng/ml) is useful, and a dose above 1000 ng/ml is potentially more effective but carries the risk of severe ADRs in the central nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)