REVISITING HITTI'S THOUGHTS ON PALESTINE AND ARAB IDENTITY.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Shibley, Gregory J.
  • Source:
    Arab Studies Quarterly. Spring2019, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p150-171. 22p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Philip K. Hitti was the first scholar to study Arab-American immigration to the United States. Highly influential during the twentieth century, his ideas have lost much of their appeal to current interpreters of the early diaspora of Arab-Americans called Syrians at the time. This article revisits Hitti's thought, focusing on the issues of Palestine and Arab identity. Using primary source material from Hitti's archived papers, plus multiple secondary sources, I argue that Hitti maintained consistency, both in his advocacy of the general Arab stance opposing a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and in his construction of Arab identity as different from Syrian identity. On Palestine, Hitti clashed with Albert Einstein, in public discourse and in an acerbic private exchange of correspondence. On Arab identity, Hitti held firm to a strict interpretation, distinguishing Syrians, conceptualized as Christian, from Arabs, conceptualized as Islamic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Arab Studies Quarterly is the property of Pluto Journals and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)