What do stakeholders understand by self‐determination? Consensus for its evaluation.

CONCEPTUAL structures; CONSENSUS (Social sciences); DELPHI method; EXPERIMENTAL design; RESEARCH methodology; PEOPLE with intellectual disabilities; SELF-perception; QUALITATIVE research; EXTENDED families; QUANTITATIVE research

Background: Advances in international studies on self‐determination point out the need for continuous efforts to deepen its understanding and implications. The aim of this study is to obtain a comprehensive pool of items to operationalize the self‐determination construct that serves as a starting point towards a valid instrument based on the reports of others. Method: We conducted a Delphi study of three rounds involving three panels of experts: ten professionals, five people with intellectual disability and six relatives of people with intellectual disability. Data analysis required both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: The initial pool of 131 items was refined through the different rounds to a final set composed of 115—some were removed and new ones were added. Content‐based evidence is provided. In this study, the present authors generated a potential valid pool of items to develop a new measurement tool based on the latest advances on the self‐determination theoretical framework. Conclusions: The implications for future research focus on strengthening the knowledge of self‐determination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)