Identity statuses as developmental trajectories: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescents.

Publisher: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0333507 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-6601 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00472891 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Youth Adolesc Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: 1999- : New York, NY : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
Original Publication: New York, Plenum Press.

Adolescent Development* ; Internal-External Control* ; Self Concept* ; Social Identification*; Adolescent Behavior/*psychology ; Students/*psychology; Adolescent ; Female ; Humans ; Identification, Psychological ; Individuality ; Interpersonal Relations ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Psychology, Adolescent

This study tested whether Marcia's original identity statuses of achievement, moratorium, early closure (a new label for foreclosure), and diffusion, can be considered identity status trajectories. That is, we examined whether these statuses are distinct and relatively stable, over-time configurations of commitment strength, levels of in-depth exploration of present commitments, and consideration of alternative commitments. The study examined identity development in a five-wave study of 923 early-to-middle (49.3% female) and 390 middle-to-late adolescents (56.7% female), covering the ages of 12-20. Using Latent class growth analysis (LCGA), the authors found that Marcia's (1966) statuses are indeed identity status trajectories. Two kinds of moratorium were also found: the classical moratorium and searching moratorium. Support was found for Waterman's developmental hypothesis of the identity status model: the number of achievers was significantly higher, and the number of diffusions lower, in middle-to-late adolescence than in early-to-middle adolescence. Females were more often in the advanced identity status trajectories, and stable differences were found between the trajectories in psychosocial adjustment. Study findings highlight that identity formation should be conceptualized as an over-time process.

J Adolesc. 2007 Feb;30(1):63-79. (PMID: 16635525)
Am Psychol. 2000 May;55(5):469-80. (PMID: 10842426)
J Adolesc. 2008 Apr;31(2):207-22. (PMID: 17959238)
Psychol Methods. 2001 Mar;6(1):18-34. (PMID: 11285809)
Adolescence. 1995 Winter;30(120):931-44. (PMID: 8588527)
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1565-81. (PMID: 20840241)
Ann Hum Biol. 2000 Mar-Apr;27(2):173-86. (PMID: 10768422)
J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):173-87. (PMID: 24277583)
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jun;24(6):882-91. (PMID: 10888079)
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jun;24(6):892-901. (PMID: 10888080)
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):281-99. (PMID: 20822253)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 May;3(5):551-8. (PMID: 5939604)
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1985;21(4):995-8. (PMID: 4089116)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):898-912. (PMID: 19309210)
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jan;47(1):203-12. (PMID: 21244159)
Am Psychol. 2006 May-Jun;61(4):315-27. (PMID: 16719676)
J Adolesc. 2010 Oct;33(5):683-98. (PMID: 20004962)
J Adolesc. 2002 Dec;25(6):571-86. (PMID: 12490176)

Date Created: 20111118 Date Completed: 20121126 Latest Revision: 20240330

20240330

PMC3394234

10.1007/s10964-011-9730-y

22089632