ALTERNATIVE AND TRADITIONAL INDICATORS OF THE BRAZILIAN FEMINIST STUDIES JOURNAL. (English)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      Indicadores alternativos e tradicionais da Revista Estudos Feministas Brasileira. (Portuguese)
    • Abstract:
      The connection between traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample included the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 4,984 altmetrics data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetrics data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating is important for indicating the tools and networks in which readers and users share scientific content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      A conexão de indicadores tradicionais e alternativos de impacto acadêmico tem sido recomendada por estudiosos do campo dos estudos métricos por serem considerados complementares e oferecerem um quadro mais completo da avaliação de resultados de pesquisa. A partir dessa perspectiva o presente estudo de cunho exploratório descritivo, teve o objetivo de analisar o coeficiente de correlação entre o impacto tradicional e alternativo da Revista Estudos Feministas. A amostra constituiu o período de 2001 a 2018. Os dados de análise foram obtidos na base Dimensions via API. Foram analisados 1.296 textos que contaram com 2.609 citações e 4.984 dados altmétricos. Os resultados apontaram que o Mendeley obteve uma avaliação positiva na correlação do coeficiente de Pearson ao ser comparado com o quantitativo de artigos publicados e com os indicadores de citação e visibilidade. O estudo detectou que os dados altmétricos são 4,6 vezes maiores que o tradicional, apesar de flutuantes eles são importantes para a indicação das ferramentas e redes onde estão os leitores e usuários que compartilham conteúdo científico. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Brazilian Journal of Information Science is the property of Brazilian Journal of Information Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)