Research culture in Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology: Fact or fantasy?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: Fostering a research culture is a key goal of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, yet there has never been an organization‐wide enquiry into the extent to which this is being realized. The purpose of this work was to address that deficit for the Radiation Oncology (RO) Faculty to serve as a baseline for future comparison. The hypothesis was that such a culture is closer to fact than fantasy. Methods: With College approval, three de‐identified Excel spreadsheets detailing 25 research‐related sub‐categories of the Faculty's Continuing Professional Development (CPD) database were interrogated for the 2019–21 triennium, accepting that research activity in 2020–21 would be COVID‐19 suppressed. The numbers obligated to self‐report CPD were 482, 496 and 511, respectively. Primary endpoints were the percentages of ROs claiming at least one research‐related activity overall, and in each of the sub‐categories individually, by year. Secondary endpoints were the "breadth" (number of sub‐categories claimed/individual) and "depth" (percentages solely claiming in one of four lower‐level sub‐categories), by year. Results: ROs claimed in 23/25 sub‐categories. The percentages of ROs claiming at least one research‐related activity were 71%, 44%, and 62% in 2019–21, respectively. The median number of sub‐categories claimed by these ROs was 2 (range 1–10) in each year. The commonest activity was journal article co‐author (25%, 16% and 27%, respectively). For 2019, the most representative year, other common activities were inhouse/local meeting presentation (17%), invited lecture at state level or above (15%), manuscript peer review and research project principal investigator (14% each). The percentages of ROs solely claiming in one lower‐level activity ranged between 4.4% and 5.9% per year. Conclusion: A culture of research is arguably more fact than fantasy in ANZ. It is likely that Faculty curriculum requirements, research funding and other promotional initiatives have contributed substantively to this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)