Discrepancies between Self- and Clinical Staff Members' Perception of Cognitive Functioning among Patients with Schizophrenia Undergoing Long-Term Hospitalization.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Kaneko F;Kaneko F; Okamura H; Okamura H
  • Source:
    Occupational therapy international [Occup Ther Int] 2019 Nov 03; Vol. 2019, pp. 6547096. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 03 (Print Publication: 2019).
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Hindawi in collaboration with John Wiley & Sons, Inc Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9433361 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1557-0703 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09667903 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Occup Ther Int Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2017- : London : Hindawi in collaboration with John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
      Original Publication: London : Whurr Publishers, c1994-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      In Japan, long-term hospitalization of patients with schizophrenia is still prevalent, even though the focus of psychiatric care is shifting from hospitals to the community. Difficulties in discharge planning often arise because clinical staff members' functional assessment differs from that of patients' self-assessment. Therefore, we attempted to identify characteristics related to these perceptual differences to promote the development of more effective approaches toward the discharge and societal reintegration of patients with schizophrenia undergoing prolonged hospitalization. Forty-eight long-term inpatients (23 men and 25 women with a mean age of 60.72 years) with schizophrenia were examined using the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale Japanese version (SCoRS-J), Life Skills Profile (LSP), and Profile of Mood States- (POMS-) Brief Form. Differences between patients' self-ratings and clinical staff members' ratings on the SCoRS-J were used to divide patients into overestimators, underestimators, and accurate raters. These groups were then comparatively analyzed. Accordingly, overestimators displayed significantly severe cognitive dysfunction on the SCoRS-J objective ratings ( p = .001) and significantly less difficulty on the SCoRS-J subjective ratings ( p = .002) as compared to underestimators. Overestimators also scored significantly lower on the communication ( p = .012) and responsibility ( p = .021) LSP subscales compared to underestimators, and the total LSP score for overestimators was significantly lower compared to accurate raters ( p = .036) and underestimators ( p = .009). However, underestimators displayed significantly higher confusion on the titular POMS subscale than did overestimators ( p = .021). These findings indicate that, among the three groups, overestimators scored lowest for objectively rated functioning. In contrast, underestimators attained the highest functioning; however, they were also confused. Clinical staff should examine how patients' self-perceptions deviate from the perceptions of staff and implement an appropriate approach considering the patient characteristics revealed from the results of this study.
      Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
      (Copyright © 2019 Fumiko Kaneko and Hitoshi Okamura.)
    • References:
      Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. (PMID: 15531406)
      Psychiatry Res. 2014 Apr 30;216(1):12-6. (PMID: 24529815)
      Schizophr Res. 2016 Mar;171(1-3):131-6. (PMID: 26811232)
      Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 03;11:449-468. (PMID: 28424542)
      Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Sep;69(9):512-22. (PMID: 25801941)
      Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):386-91. (PMID: 25499045)
      J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Dec;41(12):1012-8. (PMID: 17014866)
      J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):e1130-e1136. (PMID: 27780318)
      Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;52(6):688-92. (PMID: 21296346)
      Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;25(2):185-91. (PMID: 25104226)
      Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2015;117(9):713-29. (PMID: 26721063)
      Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;61(4):379-85. (PMID: 25182810)
      Schizophr Res. 2015 Mar;162(1-3):234-47. (PMID: 25631453)
      Expert Rev Neurother. 2016 Oct;16(10):1193-204. (PMID: 27278672)
      Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2008;110(11):1007-22. (PMID: 19202923)
      Schizophr Bull. 1989;15(2):325-37. (PMID: 2749191)
      Int J Law Psychiatry. 1996 Summer-Fall;19(3-4):413-35. (PMID: 8968819)
      Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2011 Nov;31(5-6):259-62. (PMID: 22256616)
      Schizophr Res. 2015 Aug;166(1-3):261-8. (PMID: 26095015)
      Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:165-73. (PMID: 27552661)
      Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;163(3):426-32. (PMID: 16513863)
      Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):334-43. (PMID: 19525354)
      Schizophr Res. 2014 Nov;159(2-3):527-32. (PMID: 25239126)
      Schizophr Res. 2008 Oct;105(1-3):156-64. (PMID: 18718740)
      Neuropsychology. 2015 Sep;29(5):675-82. (PMID: 25643212)
      J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998 Jul;186(7):432-6. (PMID: 9680045)
      Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):575-582. (PMID: 27440672)
      Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):190-5. (PMID: 22386735)
      J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;77 Suppl 2:8-11. (PMID: 26919052)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20191129 Date Completed: 20200305 Latest Revision: 20200305
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6875358
    • Accession Number:
      10.1155/2019/6547096
    • Accession Number:
      31777475