Which Data Do Elementary School Teachers Use to Determine Reading Difficulties in Their Students?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Schmitterer AMA;Schmitterer AMA; Brod G; Brod G; Brod G
  • Source:
    Journal of learning disabilities [J Learn Disabil] 2021 Sep; Vol. 54 (5), pp. 349-364. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 15.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Professional Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0157312 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1538-4780 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00222194 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Learn Disabil Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2008- : Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage, : Professional Press
      Original Publication: Chicago, Professional Press.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Small-group interventions allow for tailored instruction for students with learning difficulties. A crucial first step is the accurate identification of students who need such an intervention. This study investigated how teachers decide whether their students need a remedial reading intervention. To this end, 64 teachers of 697 third-grade students from Germany were asked to rate whether a reading intervention for their students was "not necessary," "potentially necessary," or "definitely necessary." Independent experimenters tested the students' reading and spelling abilities with standardized tests, and a subsample of 370 children participated in standardized tests of phonological awareness and vocabulary. Findings show that teachers' decisions with regard to students' needing a reading intervention overlapped more with results from standardized spelling assessments than from reading assessments. Hierarchical linear models indicated that students' spelling abilities, along with phonological awareness and vocabulary, explained variance in teachers' ratings over and above students' reading skills. Teachers thus relied on proximal cues such as spelling skills to reach their decision. These findings are discussed in relation to clinical standards and educational contexts. Findings indicate that the teachers' assignment of children to interventions might be underspecified, and starting points for specific teacher training programs are outlined.
    • References:
      J Learn Disabil. 2000 Mar-Apr;33(2):200-10. (PMID: 15505949)
      Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):934-45. (PMID: 9383616)
      J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):204-16. (PMID: 22491810)
      Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):959-88. (PMID: 15535744)
      J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):212-24. (PMID: 22022952)
      Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1408-19. (PMID: 23785038)
      Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. (PMID: 19673146)
      J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2013 Jan 1;13(1):7-14. (PMID: 26290655)
      J Learn Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):229-43. (PMID: 19834134)
      J Child Neurol. 2004 Oct;19(10):759-65. (PMID: 15559891)
      Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51. (PMID: 29890888)
      J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):593-607. (PMID: 22141434)
      Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. (PMID: 17835457)
      Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2009 Nov;37(6):499-510; quiz 511-2. (PMID: 19890813)
      Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Apr 1;3(1):44. (PMID: 20161671)
      PLoS One. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e103537. (PMID: 25072465)
      Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: diagnostics; reading intervention; teachers
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210115 Date Completed: 20211028 Latest Revision: 20211028
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8358535
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/0022219420981990
    • Accession Number:
      33448247