Using sociotechnical theory to understand medication safety work in primary care and prescribers' use of clinical decision support: a qualitative study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101552874 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2044-6055 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20446055 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMJ Open Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011-
    • Subject Terms:
      Patient Safety* ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical*; Humans ; Qualitative Research ; England ; Pharmacists ; Primary Health Care
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: The concept of safety work draws attention to the intentional work of ensuring safety within care systems. Clinical decision support (CDS) has been designed to enhance medication safety in primary care by providing decision-making support to prescribers. Sociotechnical theory understands that healthcare settings are complex and dynamically connected systems of fluid networks, human agents, changing relationships and social processes. This study aimed to understand the relationship between safety work and the use of CDS.
      Design and Setting: This qualitative study took place across nine different general practices in England. Stakeholders included general practitioners (GPs) and general practice-based pharmacists and nurse prescribers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to illicit how the system was used by the participants in the context of medication safety work. Data analysis conducted alongside data collection was thematic and drew on socio-technical theory.
      Participants: Twenty-three interviews were conducted with 14 GPs, three nurse prescribers and three practice pharmacists between February 2018 and June 2020.
      Results: Safety work was contextually situated in a complex network of relationships. Three interconnected themes were interpreted from the data: (1) the use of CDS within organisational and social practices and workflows; (2) safety work and the use of CDS within the interplay between prescribers, patients and populations; and (3) the affordances embedded in CDS systems.
      Conclusion: The use of sociotechnical theory here extends current thinking in patient safety particularly in the ways that safety work was co-constituted with the use of CDS alerts. This has implications for implementation and use to ensure that the contexts into which such CDS systems are implemented are taken into account. Understanding how alerts can adapt safety culture will help improve the efficacy of CDS systems, enhance prescribing safety and help to further understand how safety work is achieved in primary care.
      Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
      (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
    • References:
      Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;104:210-9. (PMID: 24581080)
      Trials. 2012 Jun 08;13:78. (PMID: 22682095)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):306-24. (PMID: 26283462)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):181-97. (PMID: 26679563)
      J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):487-91. (PMID: 24166725)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):313-20. (PMID: 17693682)
      PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250946. (PMID: 33939750)
      BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar;9(1):. (PMID: 32209593)
      J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e76-84. (PMID: 23470696)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:97-114. (PMID: 14498932)
      PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0167683. (PMID: 27977697)
      PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0205419. (PMID: 30365508)
      BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Apr;26(1):0. (PMID: 31039120)
      Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(1):3-12. (PMID: 15949170)
      JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):243-4. (PMID: 22797640)
      BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. (PMID: 33153451)
      BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Dec 10;3(1):. (PMID: 26734305)
      Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Jul 12;9(9):559-573. (PMID: 30181862)
      BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):94. (PMID: 29921277)
      BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):96-105. (PMID: 32527980)
      J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):138-47. (PMID: 16357358)
      Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):357-64. (PMID: 22589569)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):570. (PMID: 30029638)
      PLoS One. 2021 Dec 22;16(12):e0261153. (PMID: 34936661)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):69. (PMID: 32303219)
      BMJ. 2011 Nov 03;343:d6788. (PMID: 22053317)
      Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Oct;63(615):e713-20. (PMID: 24152487)
      BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):95. (PMID: 29921272)
      Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):30-33. (PMID: 31156894)
      J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367. (PMID: 29092808)
      BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 14;16:129. (PMID: 26462820)
      BJGP Open. 2021 Oct 26;5(5):. (PMID: 34226173)
      BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 15;6(2):e010208. (PMID: 26880671)
      BMJ Open. 2017 May 10;7(5):e014810. (PMID: 28495815)
      BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 8;19(1):155. (PMID: 30193576)
      Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):579-87. (PMID: 21613378)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):198-215. (PMID: 26663206)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Jun;36(5):703-18. (PMID: 24641087)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Primary Care; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Quality in health care
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20230427 Date Completed: 20230501 Latest Revision: 20230504
    • Publication Date:
      20240514
    • Accession Number:
      PMC10151989
    • Accession Number:
      10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068798
    • Accession Number:
      37105697