Speech disfluencies in children with developmental dyslexia: How do they differ from typical development?

Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9803709 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1460-6984 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13682822 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Lang Commun Disord Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: 2011- : Malden, MA : Wiley
Original Publication: London : Taylor & Francis for the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, c1998-

Dyslexia*/psychology ; Dyslexia*/diagnosis; Humans ; Child ; Female ; Male ; Child Language ; Reading ; France ; Speech Production Measurement ; Language Development Disorders/psychology ; Language Development Disorders/diagnosis

Background: Disfluency is a multifactorial concept that can be linked to several of the language production levels, in both typical and atypical populations. In children, the language system is still developing and few studies have explored disfluency patterns. In typical development (TD), in particular, studies have shown discrepancies according to the language being considered. In neurodevelopmental disorders, such as developmental dyslexia (DD), it is still unclear whether the pattern of disfluency is similar to TD.
Aims: To analyse the type of disfluency and their evolution in French children aged 8-12 years. Also to compare the pattern of disfluency in DD and TD, and to test whether disfluencies were correlated with reading difficulties.
Methods & Procedures: A total of 25 children with DD and 21 children with TD aged 8-12.6 years produced an autobiographical narrative. Seven types of disfluencies were coded: part-word repetitions; repetitions of monosyllabic words; other types of repetitions (words and phrases); filled pauses; revisions-substitutions; revisions-additions; and abandoned utterances. We compared the proportion of each disfluency in DD and TD. Spearman correlations were then performed between disfluencies, reading performance and age.
Outcomes & Results: The results showed that both DD and TD children mainly produced filled pauses, repetitions of monosyllabic words and substitutions. Both groups displayed a high rate of disfluency (> 10%). No correlations with age were found. Correlations with reading performance were significant in the TD group only.
Conclusions & Implications: The study showed that DD is not characterized by a specific pattern of disfluency. Additionally, disfluency rates were similar in children aged 8-12 years. In contrast to other languages, the current study suggests that French-speaking children have a high rate of disfluency. The study also suggests that disfluency should be interpreted with caution in DD, given that TD children also have a high rate of disfluency. Therefore, it seems important to adapt the pathological threshold of disfluency to the language being spoken in order to avoid an overestimation of the prevalence of these deficits in French-speaking children.
What This Paper Adds: What is already known on this subject TD children produce a high rate of disfluency, which is also influenced by the language being spoken. No study looked at the effect of DD on disfluency production. Nonetheless, problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience may impact lexical development and speech fluency. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge In our study, both groups (French-speaking children) produced a substantial amount of disfluency as compared with other languages (> 10%). Additionally, the pattern of disfluency was similar in TD and DD (namely, filled pauses, prolongations repetitions of monosyllabic words and substitutions). In the DD group, disfluency production was not correlated with reading performance. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? These results indicate that it is crucial to consider the language being spoken when examining disfluency in order to avoid an overestimation of language difficulties in some languages, such as in French. Moreover, the production of disfluencies in DD should not be considered as language dysfunction since the pattern of disfluency what quite similar in TD and DD, and did not correlate with their reading difficulties.
(© 2023 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.)

American psychiatric association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) (5th ed.).
Balčiuniene, I. & Kornev, A.N. (2016) Linguistic disfluency in children discourse: Language limitations or executive strategy? In Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue” (pp. 59–72).
Burke, D.M., MacKay, D.G. & James, L.E. (2000) Theoretical approaches to language and aging. In T. Perfect & E. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 204–237). Oxford University Press.
Cappelli, G., Noccetti, S., Simi, N., Arcara, G. & Bambini, V. (2022) Dyslexia and pragmatic skills. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/85as2.
Carlo, E.J. & Watson, J.B. (2003) Disfluencies of 3‐ and 5‐year‐old Spanish‐speaking children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094‐730X(03)00004‐4.
Clark, H.H. & Fox Tree, J.E. (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010‐0277(02)00017‐3.
Faust, M. & Sharfstein‐Friedman, S. (2003) Naming difficulties in adolescents with dyslexia: Application of the tip‐of‐the‐tongue paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278‐2626(03)00112‐X.
Fisher, E.L., Barton‐Hulsey, A., Walters, C., Sevcik, R.A. & Morris, R. (2019) Executive functioning and narrative language in children with dyslexia. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 28(3), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP‐18‐0106.
Flessas, J. & Lussier, F. (2003) EVAC—Épreuve Verbale d'Aptitudes Cognitives. ECPA.
Fox Tree, J.E. (1995) The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1032.
Hanly, S. & Vandenberg, B. (2010) Tip‐of‐the‐tongue and word retrieval deficits in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338744.
Jacquier‐Roux, M., Valdois, S., Zorman, M., Lequette, C. & Poulet, G. (2005) ODEDYS: Outil de dépistage des dyslexies, version 2 (IUFM Académie de Grenoble, Cogni‐Sciences et Laboratoire de psychologie et de neurocognition, CNRS (UMR 5105)). Université Pierre‐Mendès‐France.
Jansson‐Verkasalo, E., Silvén, M., Lehtiö, I. & Eggers, K. (2021) Speech disfluencies in typically developing Finnish‐speaking children–preliminary results. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 35(8), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1818287.
Kavé, G. & Goral, M. (2017) Do age‐related word retrieval difficulties appear (or disappear) in connected speech? Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 24(5), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040.
Kornev, A.N. & Balčiūnienė, I. (2015) Narrative production weakness in Russian dyslexics: Linguistic or procedural limitations? Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 11, 141. https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.09.
Leclercq, A.L., Suaire, P. & Moyse, A. (2018) Beyond stuttering: Speech disfluencies in normally fluent French‐speaking children at age 4. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 32(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1344878.
Lecocq, P. (1996) L’É.CO.S.SE une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico‐sémantique. Presses Univ. Septentrion.
Lefavrais, P. (2005) Test de l'Alouette, version révisée. Paris: ECPA.
Lickley, R. (2017) Disfluency in typical and stuttered speech. Fattori Sociali e Biologici Nella Variazione Fonetica—Social and Biological Factors in Speech Variation, April, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.17469/O2103AISV000019.
Morel, M.‐A.. & Danon‐Boileau, L. (1998) Grammaire de l'intonation: L'exemple du français. Ophrys.
Pistono, A. & Hartsuiker, R. (2021) Eye‐movements can help disentangle mechanisms underlying disfluency. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(8), 1038–1055. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6mx2y.
Pistono, A., Pariente, J., Bézy, C., Lemesle, B., Le Men, J. & Jucla, M. (2019) What happens when nothing happens? An investigation of pauses as a compensatory mechanism in early Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 124, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.018.
Pistono, A., Senoussi, M., Guerrier, L., Rafiq, M., Giméno, M., Péran, P., Jucla, M., Pariente, J. (2021) Language Network Connectivity Increases in Early Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 82(1), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad‐201584.
Postma, A. & Kolk, H. (1993) The covert repair hypothesis prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(3), 472–487.
Schmitter‐Edgecombe, M., Vesneski, M. & Jones, D.W.R. (2000) Aging and word‐finding: A comparison of spontaneous and constrained Naming Tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(6), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887‐6177(99)00039‐6.
Schnadt, M.J. & Corley, M. (2006) The influence of lexical, conceptual and planning based factors on disfluency production. In Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada, 28(28), 8–13.
Soppelsa, R. & Albaret, J.M. (2004) Manuel de la Batterie d'Evaluation du Mouvement chez l'Enfant (M‐ABC). ECPA.
Wechsler, D. (2005) WISC‐IV. Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants (4e ed.). ECPA.

ANR DYSTAC-MAP French National Research Agency

Keywords: developmental dyslexia; discourse; disfluency; language development

Date Created: 20231108 Date Completed: 20240508 Latest Revision: 20240508

20240508

10.1111/1460-6984.12978

37936566