Common pool resource governance in strong-government context: A case study of caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

The common pool resource (CPR) theory has inspired the recognition of community self-governance in natural resource management. However, many CPR literature treated government as an external variable to community, without sufficiently considering the close interaction between the two, especially in strong-government context. In this paper, we applied two case villages on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China with different governance systems for caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis), a CPR with lucrative values, to study the effects of the different government interventions on the local social conditions and rangeland ecosystem. One village interacted with facilitative local government that helped to develop a pro-community self-governance institution, while the other faced a forceful government that substituted the community self-governance. Furthermore, we explored the underlying mechanism from the view of the congruence between the government actions to achieve administrative objectives and the community demands for self-governance. We found that the better outcomes occurred in the village with the facilitative government involvement, because the government actions were congruent with the community demands. The model with facilitative government involvement presents a possible approach, when CPR appropriator boundary became semi-opened to outsiders, by which the community self-governance institution could function well with government help in institution design, monitoring and sanction. Our findings enrich the applications of CPR governance theory, particularly in the aspect that how government-community interacts to develop a self-governance institution in strong-government context. ● Rather than taking government as one external variable in CPR study, different level of governments functions differently. ● In strong-government system, local governments have considerable space when implementing and localizing policies. ● When CPR boundary becomes semi-opened to outsiders, self-governance could function well with local government involvement. ● Instead of emphasizing community's equal and independent status, how government-community interaction needs to be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Environmental Science & Policy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)