Association between the home environment and development among 3- to 11-month infants in Shanghai, China.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Cao Z;Cao Z; Su X; Su X; Ni Y; Ni Y; Luo T; Luo T; Hua J; Hua J
  • Source:
    Child: care, health and development [Child Care Health Dev] 2022 Jan; Vol. 48 (1), pp. 45-54. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 19.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7602632 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2214 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03051862 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Child Care Health Dev Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Literature highlighted the home environment as a major factor influencing the overall development of children. However, minimal information is available about the home environment in China and especially in small infants. This survey was conducted to find out the association between the home environment and the early development of infants.
      Methods: A total of 1850 infants aged 3-11 months were randomly selected during December 2014 to September 2015. Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS) was used to measure the home environment considering the availability of toys, physical space and variety of stimulation. The Age and Stage Questionnaire-Chinese (ASQ-C) was used to measure potential developmental delays among infants. Bivariate logistic regression model was used to test the association between home environment and potential developmental delays.
      Results: The percentages of infants with insufficient activity space ranged from 25.27% to 30.23%. With the increase of age, the number of toys available to infants was also increasing. However, varieties of stimulation were decreasing. Compared with infants who have sufficient physical space, the risk of problem-solving development delay increased 26.0% (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97). The risk of gross motor delay was 47.0% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.99) lower in infants with sufficient variety of stimulation than infants without. Fine-motor toys were associated with all domains in ASQ-C except communication development, while gross motor toys mainly affected fine motor and problem-solving development.
      Conclusion: Positive associations between home environment and development among 3- to 11-month infants in Shanghai, China, were revealed in the current study. The results from the study are expected to be useful for early childhood caretakers, public health practitioners and other professionals to plan interventions, especially for low-income families living in a disadvantaged environment.
      (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      Beswick, J. (2014). The use of the ages and stages questionnaire 3 (ASQ-3). Community Practitioner, 87(11).14.
      Britto, P.-R., Lye, S.-J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A. K., Matthews, S. G., Vaivada, T., Perez-Escamilla, R., Rao, N., Ip, P., Fernald, L. C. H., MacMillan, H., Hanson, M., Wachs, T. D., Yao, H., Yoshikawa, H., Cerezo, A., Leckman, J. F., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2017). Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. Lancet, 389(10064), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3.
      Caçola, P., Gabbard, C., Santos, D.-C., & Batistela, A. C. (2011). Development of the affordances in the home environment for motor development-infant scale. Pediatrics International, 53(6), 820-825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03386.x.
      Caçola, P. M., Gabbard, C., Montebelo, M.-I., & Santos, D. C. (2015a). Further development and validation of the affordances in the home environment for motor development-infant scale (AHEMD-IS). Physical Therapy, 95(6), 901-923. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140011.
      Caçola, P. M., Gabbard, C., Montebelo, M.-I., & Santos, D. C. (2015b). The new affordances in the home environment for motor development - infant scale (AHEMD-IS): Versions in English and Portuguese languages. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 19(6), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0112.
      Defilipo, É. C., Frônio, J. D., Teixeira, M. T., Leite, I. C., Bastos, R. R., Vieira, M. D., & Ribeiro, L. C. (2012). Opportunities in the home environment for motor development. Revista de Saúde Pública, 46(4), 633-641.
      Freitas, T.-C., Gabbard, C., Caçola, P., Montebelo, M. I., & Santos, D. C. (2013). Family socioeconomic status and the provision of motor affordances in the home. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 17(4), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552013005000096.
      Gabbard, C., Priscila, C., & Luis-Paulo, R. (2008). A new inventory for assessing affordances in the home environment for motor development (AHEMD-SR). Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0235-6.
      Halbwachs, M., Muller, J. B., Nguyen The Tich, S., de La Rochebrochard, E., Gascoin, G., Branger, B., Rouger, V., Rozé, J. C., & Flamant, C. (2013). Usefulness of parent-completed ASQ for neurodevelopmental screening of preterm children at five years of age. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071925.
      Haydari, A., Parviz, A., & Maryam-Zarra, N. (2009). Relationship between affordances in the home environment and motor development in children age 18-42 months. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 319-328.
      Hua, J., Duan, T., Gu, G., Wo, D., Zhu, Q., Liu, J. Q., Liu, M., Wu, Z., & Meng, W. (2016). Effects of home and education environments on children's motor performance in China. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58(8), 868-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13073.
      Lo, S., Das, P., & Horton, R. (2017). A good start in life will ensure a sustainable future for all. Lancet, 389(10064), 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31774-3.
      McCoy, D.-C., Marcus, W., & Günther, F. (2018). Measuring early childhood development at a global scale: Evidence from the caregiver-reported early development instruments. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45, 58-68.
      Nadeem, S., Rafique, G., Khowaja, L., & Yameen, A. (2014). Assessing home environment for early child development in Pakistan. Child Care in Practice, 20(2), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2013.859565.
      Pelletier, D., & Neuman, M.-J. (2014). Advancing the nutrition and early childhood development agenda: Indicators and guidance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1308, 232-244.
      Rodrigues, L.-P., Saraiva, L., & Gabbard, C. (2005). Development and construct validation of an inventory for assessing the home environment for motor development. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599276.
      Singh, A., Squires, J., Yeh, C.-J., Heo, K. H., & Bian, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 5(1), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.184636.
      Steenis, L.-J., Verhoeven, M., Hessen, D.-J., & van Baar, A. (2015). Parental and professional assessment of early child development: The ASQ-3 and the Bayley-III-NL. Early Human Development, 91(3), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.01.008.
      Valadi, S., Carl, G., & Faramarz, H. (2020). Effects of affordances in the home environment on children's personal-social, problem-solving, and communication skills. Child: Care, Health and Development, 46(4), 429-435.
      Vameghi, R., Sajedi, F., Kraskian Mojembari, A., Habiollahi, A., Lornezhad, H. R., & Delavar, B. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and standardization of ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ) in Iranian children. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(5), 522-528.
      Velikonja, T., Edbrooke-Childs, J., Calderon, A., Sleed, M., Brown, A., & Deighton, J. (2017). The psychometric properties of the ages & stages questionnaires for ages 2-2.5: A systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(1), 1-17.
      Zoghi, A., Masomeh, S., & Abdollah, G. (2016). The impact of a motor affordance intervention on motor and cognitive development of young children. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(5), 743-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9616-4.
    • Grant Information:
      20184Y0078 Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning; GWV-10.2-YQ14 Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning; 81703233 National Natural Science Foundation of China
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: AHEMD-IS; ASQ-C; affordances; development; home environment; infant
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210728 Date Completed: 20220202 Latest Revision: 20220531
    • Publication Date:
      20240105
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/cch.12902
    • Accession Number:
      34318949